Starrett views training in the gym as a means to get the perfect technique in "archetypical" movements and then teaching the athlete to combine movements to practice transitions, to ultimately remove pain in daily life and enhance athletic performance. It's a pretty comprehensive book, covering topics ranging from principles of healthy movement, how to sit, stand up, perform strength exercises and to mobilize.
Starret introduces the idea of creating torque, which he seems pretty proud of, considering he sees everything wrong in the world as a lack of torque which can be solved by screwing your hands into the ground and flexing your butt. Many workout instructions can be summarized as such: Screw your hands/feet into the ground, create torque, squeeze your butt and brace your core. The instructions got monotonous after a while.
Starrett's case against stretching is a good one: our mobility issues aren't merely muscular. It is a factor of the mobility of joints, motor-control, nerves, connective muscle-tissue (fascia) and even skin. Stretching a lot can invite injuries because it increases the range-of-motion without learning motor-control for that newly acquired length.
Starret makes the point that when you restore range or function to a joint or tissue, it must reflect in the training, you must utilize the mobility if you want to retain it without perpetually stretching.
To solve this problem, Starret introduces rubber bands and many other gadgets to mobilize the joints and other fun stuff, not only the muscles. I might be awfully conservative here, but the book failed to convince me that gadgets and better to prevent injuries than moving with your body weight. I'm afraid that Starrett is so inventive in his techniques as a sort of way to leave his personal imprint on the fitness world. It seems to me that the people who are hyper-focused on injury-prevention are those who always get injured.
Starrett is the kind of guy that would be focusing on creating external rotation, creating torque and screwing his hands into the bed when he makes love. Or goes to social events and laughs because it's healthy for his internal organs.
I was enthusiastic about the premise of the book, namely to be like a leopard, that's always ready for action, and doesn't stretch for warm-up or keep its mobility. However, the second half of the book is dedicated in hundreds of ways to use weird gadgets to "mobilize" your joints and muscles without stretching. It seems like we've come full-circle, haven't we?
Some tips seemed off to me, for instance, that the feet should be straight forward during squats, shouldn't this be a personal preference due to one's physiology?
It's clear that Starrett knows his physiology, and he gave me many ideas for my training, but the enthusiastic Californian attitude is not my cup of tea.
"Are you ready to become self-actualized by stroking yourself with the VooDoo Floss Band™ and increasing consciousness by mushing a Supernova® ball into your face?"
Although I am not particularly enthusiastic about the presentation and remain sceptical to the general approach, I have picked up a lot of interesting technical tweaks to many exercises. There is genuinely good advice in the book, such as seeing the spine as three parts and to aim for a global arch. Meaning that the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine should be a part of the same extension in relation to each other. This idea is useful, for instance, when we sit slouched, we tend to try to fix it by overextending the thoracic spine to compensate, which isn't good for the spine. Better would be stand up, brace to create a neutral spine and then sit back down.
In conclusion, a useful handbook for athletes and coaches in many ways, and despite my scepticism of the general approach, I'd still recommend it.