Reproduction from 1912 edition, The Macaulay Company. The Schilling Press New York.Original Publication Date 1909, by The Macaulay Company.Excerpt from One A Sequel to Three Weeks "In fairness to this book of mine - and to me the great moral lesson I have endeavored to teach must be considered in its entirety, and no single episode be construed as the book's sole aim. The verdict on my two years' work rests with you, dear Reader, but at least you may be sure that I have only tried to show that those who sow the wind shall reap the whirlwind."
Frustrating AF. This is a sequel to Three Weeks and similarly a tragedy, but constructed on different generation two decades after the ending of the Three Weeks. This is more based on an actual Romeo & Juliet -probably a historical happening from Austria, but the structure of the story is unbalanced. Paul is more of a side character, the main pairing is on his son.
I haven't yet read the ending second sequel, but I was left angry that Glyn threw away promising characters so easily.