Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Midbrain Mutiny: The Picoeconomics and Neuroeconomics of Disordered Gambling: Economic Theory and Cognitive Science

Rate this book
An analysis of how economic theories can be used to understand disordered and pathological gambling that calls on empirical evidence about behavior and the brain and argues that addictive gambling is the basic form of all addiction. The explanatory power of economic theory is tested by the phenomenon of irrational consumption, examples of which include such addictive behaviors as disordered and pathological gambling. Midbrain Mutiny examines different economic models of disordered gambling, using the frameworks of neuroeconomics (which analyzes decision making in the brain) and picoeconomics (which analyzes patterns of consumption behavior), and drawing on empirical evidence about behavior and the brain. The book describes addiction in neuroeconomic terms as chronic disruption of the balance between the midbrain dopamine system and the prefrontal and frontal serotonergic system, and reviews recent evidence from trials testing the effectiveness of antiaddiction drugs. The authors argue that the best way to understand disordered and addictive gambling is with a hybrid picoeconomic-neuroeconomic model.

301 pages, Paperback

First published April 1, 2008

2 people are currently reading
34 people want to read

About the author

Don H. Ross

23 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (42%)
4 stars
2 (28%)
3 stars
2 (28%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Muhammad al-Khwarizmi.
123 reviews38 followers
March 6, 2014
Good, if overly instrumentalist and too generous to neoclassical economic theory, but very dense. Very, very dense. Practically a reference work. Read in full only if you are truly hardcore about the topic of addiction.
5 reviews
August 24, 2009
This book is directed less at a general audience, and more towards academics. Having said that, I thought is was interesting none the less.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.