What do you think?
Rate this book
Laughter: A Theological Reflection
Theology is not a subject especially noted for its jokes (though one of the chapters in this book has a good collection of them). However, since laughter is such an important element in life, there would be something wrong if it could not be heard in theology: not mocking laughter, but the laughter which indicates delight and joy. And that such laughter cannot be heard today in the Roman Catholic church in its 'wintry season' is an important indication of its problems. Dr Kuschel traces a fascinating story of laughter: from Sarah in the Hebrew Bible through Homer, Plato and Aristotle, Mozart and Kafka, to Umberto Eco and The Name of the Rose. There is a long chapter on Christian laughter and its foundations in the New Testament and there is a discussion of the Christian condemnation of laughter, among the church fathers and the monastic tradition. And sometimes laughter is out of place - a lesson which our modern world has not really learned. Jesus, from whom Christianity arose, was laughed at; and his followers have known what it is to be laughed at too. That recognition, too, is vital; one more strand in what proves to be the rich vein of new theological insights offered here. How much underlies laughter! This is the kind of theology that we need: the world in all its heights and depths, everything clearly thought through, brilliantly written and at the same time centred on the Christian message' (Hans Kung). Karl-Josef Kuschel teaches ecumenical theology and theological aesthetics in the University of Tubingen.
174 pages, Paperback
First published August 1, 1994
10 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
May 24, 2013
buku ini mengikuti persoalan yang diangkat novel umberto eco "name of the rose" megnenai "pernahkah kristus tertawa"?
bergerak mundur, beberapa filsuf dan teolog dari masa yang lebih dulu dikorek pendapatnya mengenai fenomen tertawa di lingkungan religius masing-masing: sejak masa gerika kuna, romawi hingga kristen eropa.
bila di kitab-kitab perjanjian pertama [perjanjian lama] tuhan dinyatakan juga pernah tertawa, bahkan ditertawakan, maka di perjanjian baru yesus sama sekali tidak pernah ditampilkan sedang tertawa. ditertawakan ya, tapi tertawa tidak.
sementara itu, di kitab-kitab gnostik, yesus digambarkan pernah tertawa juga. jadi, ada teolog tertentu di suatu masa yang memang berpengaruh pada penyusunan kitab-kitab di perjnajian baru, yang anti-tertawa. seperti johannes chrisostomus.
tertawa pada novel umberto eco, membuka kemungkinan baru dalam melihat realita. dengan tertawa [mengambil jarak dan mengritisinya] didapat gambaran parodik yang kreatif, memberi harapan dan memberanikan seseorang.
telah lama harta ini hilang dan sekarang ditemukan lagi.
bergerak mundur, beberapa filsuf dan teolog dari masa yang lebih dulu dikorek pendapatnya mengenai fenomen tertawa di lingkungan religius masing-masing: sejak masa gerika kuna, romawi hingga kristen eropa.
bila di kitab-kitab perjanjian pertama [perjanjian lama] tuhan dinyatakan juga pernah tertawa, bahkan ditertawakan, maka di perjanjian baru yesus sama sekali tidak pernah ditampilkan sedang tertawa. ditertawakan ya, tapi tertawa tidak.
sementara itu, di kitab-kitab gnostik, yesus digambarkan pernah tertawa juga. jadi, ada teolog tertentu di suatu masa yang memang berpengaruh pada penyusunan kitab-kitab di perjnajian baru, yang anti-tertawa. seperti johannes chrisostomus.
tertawa pada novel umberto eco, membuka kemungkinan baru dalam melihat realita. dengan tertawa [mengambil jarak dan mengritisinya] didapat gambaran parodik yang kreatif, memberi harapan dan memberanikan seseorang.
telah lama harta ini hilang dan sekarang ditemukan lagi.
Displaying 1 of 1 review