I almost never write reviews on here. I simply read books and give them an appropriate star rating and then move on to the next one. I never thought that a book would make me angry enough to write a full review, but it’s happened, so here goes!
I don’t think anyone reads VC Andrews for fine literature. These are what I consider to be guilty pleasures books. The storylines are interesting enough to keep me engaged, but I don’t really have to use my mind to analyze and understand a story.
I’ve been reading VC Andrews for years, starting with the Flowers in the Attic series years ago. I knew that Andrew Neiderman became her ghost writer after she died. However, most of the books I have read in the last few years have been newer stories. I could tell that there was a difference between the writing of Flowers in the Attic and the Neiderman books, but it wasn’t that noticeable to me. Probably because there wasn’t a jarring switch between the two writers. And that’s exactly what happened in this book.
I had never read the Casteel series so when I found them in a thrift store I scooped them up, excited to read more of what VC Andrews actually wrote. The first two books were great. The writing, while certainly not award worthy, was creative enough to really make me see the characters and the story taking place. But VC Andrews died before the third book was published, so Andrew Neiderman took over at that point. The result was jarring to me. REALLY jarring. Perhaps it’s not as noticeable if you read the books with some time in between them, however, I’ve been reading them all at once, one right after the other. In all honesty, I am really surprised that there aren’t more negative reviews about this book which is part of what inspired me to write a review.
Things that really bothered me:
1. The characters. There was a massive shift in the way the main characters behaved. I wanted to justify it by saying that they just grew up and changed...but no. It’s like Neiderman didn’t even read the first two books.
~Heaven went from being strong, opinionated, and quick to react with a fiery temper to being passive and meek. She basically just bows down to Logan and Tony, decides that they know what’s best, and she does whatever they want. Throughout the first 3/4 of the book I was wondering where the old Heaven went. I AM pleased that she seemed to return to her old self at the end.
~Logan went from being 100% obsessed with Heaven to basically ignoring her and her needs and swooning over Tony and all his riches. This made absolutely no sense to me. In Dark Angel, when Logan sees Heaven dressed in all of her expensive clothes, he’s disgusted and wants the old Heaven back. He hates her for being obsessed with her new found wealth. But now suddenly he’s in love with everything rich and powerful? When he decides that they should skip their planned honeymoon to hang out at Farthy instead, I almost stopped reading the book. When he convinces Heaven to move to Boston and give up her dream teaching job, I almost stopped reading again (and I probably should have). This wasn’t Logan from the first two books AT ALL. And then there was Fanny. More specifically Logan and Fanny. Out of everything, I think this was the most unbelievable plot line. So Logan cheats on Heaven with Fanny? The same Fanny that he absolutely despised and hated throughout the first two books. The same Fanny that he was disgusted by and couldn’t get away from fast enough in the first two books. The first two books also tell us that Logan is one of the most attractive guys in town. If he had to cheat, I’m sure he could have found someone other than Fanny (though the fact that he cheated in the first place was also completely out of character). The entire story about Fanny seducing him was so far off from the Logan in the original two books that it just angered me. He spent years rejecting her, and suddenly after two glasses of wine he can’t resist her? Again, I have to ask, did Neiderman even read the first two books?
2. The storyline. I’ll ask this again - did Neiderman even read the first two books? In Dark Angel, Tony clearly tells Heaven that Troy’s body washed up on the beach. Yet, in Fallen Hearts, suddenly Troy is magically alive? I could even buy that story if Heaven has said something to Troy or Tony like “but your/his body washed up on the beach!” That would have at least given Tony the chance to say that he lied about finding the body. But nope. Heaven, whose thoughts have been completely consumed by Troy, never even remembered that she had been told that his body had been found.
I also found the custody battle between Fanny and Heaven over Drake to be a bit over the top and ridiculous. Are we supposed to believe that the lawyer who handled everything after Luke died didn’t think to get some kind of legal custody agreement in place for Heaven? He just let her take Drake with no official paperwork making her his legal guardian? I really don’t think that’s believable. So when Fanny kidnaps Drake and stakes her claim on him, we get the ridiculous custody battle. I was willing to go along with it and attempt to believe that this custody battle would even happen in the first place. But then the trial!! It’s a custody battle, not a murder trial!! But the entire town took off work and closed their businesses to come to the courthouse to watch? I mean, I get that rich people are interesting to the masses, but really? That kind of attention for a custody battle between two women who really weren’t all that important in the first place? I think that may have been the most ridiculous attempt at drama where it didn’t exist that I’ve ever read.
3. The writing. While VC Andrews will never be hailed as a notable writer, she at least wrote like an adult. Her plot lines are complex with unexpected twists and turns and she uses....adult words. That’s the best way I can describe it. She writes like an adult. Neiderman, on the other hand, writes like a middle school student. He repeatedly uses the same phrases over and over. About 3 chapters in, I was wondering if he had ever picked up a thesaurus. He’s clearly lacking in the ability to think of suitable synonyms for words. His plot line was extremely predictable, and even though he obviously made some attempts at twists, he just didn’t pull it off well. And the metaphors and similes! Oh my god! There was a point, 2 chapters in, when I jokingly thought “there should be a drinking game for this. Take a drink every time the author uses a metaphor or a simile.” And then by chapter 3 (just one chapter later) I realized, dying of alcohol poisoning would be a likely result of playing that game. I really wish I was joking when I say that. I have never in my life seen such an atrocious number of metaphors and similes. There’s literally at least one per page (and yes I know the proper use of the word “literally”), and in several cases, more than one per page. I’ve seen reviews where people complain about this in his later books, but I never noticed it until now. It’s so over the top in this book that it’s just asinine.
All in all, I gave this book two stars because somehow the story line kept me interested. I reserve 1 star for books that I find difficult to finish. This wasn’t hard to finish, and I’ll read the next two books just to finish out the series, but the ghost writer really made me angry. And it makes me a bit angry at the family of VC Andrews too. There had to be a better choice for a ghost writer, so I really wonder why they picked Neiderman. The book is so vastly different than the first two books that I find it hard to believe that they couldn’t find someone to write it more to the style of VC Andrews. I can’t help but think that VC Andrews was rolling over in her grave when this book was published.