Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Between two stools: Scatology and its representations in English literature, Chaucer to Swift

Rate this book
Between two stools investigates the representation of scatology – humorous, carnivalesque, satirical, damning and otherwise – in English literature from the middle ages to the eighteenth century.

Smith contends that the ‘two stools’ stand for two broadly distinctive attitudes towards scatology. The first is a carnivalesque, merry, even hearty disposition, typified by the writings of Chaucer and Shakespeare. The second is self-disgust, an attitude characterised by withering misanthropy and hypochondria. Smith demonstrates how the combination of high and low cultures manifests the capacity to run canonical and carnivalesque together so that sanctioned and civilised artefacts and scatological humour frequently co-exist in the works under discussion, evidence of an earlier culture’s aptitude (now lost) to occupy a position between two stools.

Of interest to cultural and literary historians, this ground-breaking study testifies to the arrival of scatology as an academic subject, at the same time recognising that it remains if not outside, then at least at the margins of conventional scholarship.

304 pages, Hardcover

First published October 2, 2012

36 people want to read

About the author

Peter J. Smith

62 books3 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (25%)
4 stars
2 (50%)
3 stars
1 (25%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Nathan "N.R." Gaddis.
1,342 reviews1,655 followers
i-want-money
July 30, 2015
"Smith’s overall argument is simple: English literature from the 18th century or earlier cannot be properly and fully interpreted without understanding that scatological references at that time were even more prevalent than they are today, and that contemporary reactions to the scatological were less “Puritanical” than ours. In his view the 20th and 21st centuries are neo-Victorian in their prudishness, which he proves by convincingly reinterpreting many scatological references modern scholars have missed in canonical literature. His discoveries are all the more surprising in academic fields as long-standing and crowded as Shakespeare’s."
reviewed by Christina Black
http://review31.co.uk/article/view/33...

That's what I've always thought!

Is it Beethoven's 2nd Symphony that's got the fart in it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGKxs...
ah, the Fourth Movement ::
http://muswrite.blogspot.com/2012/04/...
Profile Image for Terry Gregory.
7 reviews2 followers
December 30, 2012
I read an advanced copy of this outstanding book. All English teachers and those interested in the English language of Chaucer and Shakespeare should definitely have this on their reading list.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.