Months ago, I ordered a lot of historical romances off of ebay. Most were relatively recent novels, but there were a few very old ones, including A REGENCY CHARADE. I doubt that I would ever have read it otherwise, because I had never even heard of Elizabeth Mansfield.
When I started reading the book, I hoped that I might have found a new favorite author. Mansfield's writing style is very old-school, reminding me just a little of Georgette Heyer or Marion Chesney. For some readers, that might be a minus, but for me, it's a plus. In the first couple of chapters I really liked the leads, too, so I was prepared to like the book.
And then it all fell apart. The problem with this book is that Alec starts off as a sweet cinnamon roll boy, and turns into a bitter, unfaithful, cynical man. And he stays that way for basically the whole novel. There's no real character growth in him. He stays the jealous, "obsessed" husband the whole time, making the happy ending seem implausible and forced.
For me, second-chance romances only work if the characters have grown during the time apart. A story where the leads have matured over time and can now make a relationship work is believable and satisfying to me. A story where the male lead loses all the things that made him charming and ends up a worse person than at the beginning is just disappointing.
The other disappointment about the book is that the title and blurbs made it seem as if the focus of the plot would be on the "charade" in which the two leads pretend to be in love with each other. While that does happen, it happens only in the last quarter of the novel. Most of the book is about Alec and Priss growing farther and farther apart, which makes the reunion at the end seem all the more unlikely.
So, I would not recommend this novel. BUT, because I did like the writing style, I am curious to read some of Mansfield's other novels to see if they are better. Fortunately for me, there was a second novel of hers in that ebay lot, so I'll be able to give her work a second chance.