A bit of a mess. This is a general history informed by cannibalizing secondary works and, occasionally, the primary source works on which they are based. The decision to organize a narrative of London's early eighteenth-century underworld around the life of Jonathan Wild probably brought a gleam to an editor's eye. To the reader, however, it brings a very choppy narrative history whose chapters frequently repeat nuggets of information contained in other chapters. Furthermore, Wild's era of predominance was in fact rather brief. So snippets of information from the seventeenth century or anything after the first quarter of the eighteenth century turn out, often, to be anachronistic. There is a shaky grasp of larger political history as well which often crops up in misidentifications or mild misappropriations of information around the figure of Sir Robert Walpole. The history uncritically uses a variety of sources, many of which at the time went to exorbitant lengths to draw spurious connections for political purposes. In short, this is aimed at a general readership largely unfamiliar with the nuances of eighteenth-century politics or life in London. As such, it can't really be used even for undergraduates, since there are problems with some of the sourcing (and the notes are a mess). The level of writing can be problematic at times too. While there are some elegantly crafted sentences, there are also incredibly turgid recapitulations of trials or current events that are hard to parse on a single reading. Recommended only for those who want to have to further truck with the topics covered here than a surface history like this will permit. If you read Moll Flanders or The Beggars Opera seriously, you already will have gone beyond this text's remit.