What do you think?
Rate this book


288 pages, Hardcover
First published December 26, 2007

Dragons considering their dragon part as separate from their normal behavior. Shouldn't they consider their dragon part default and their human a facade and separate from themselves?
Dragons referring to their dragon self as animal and at one point, someone saying a clash of "beast and man" referring to a dragon and human fighting. (However, they do not treat humans the same way, so it's not a case of “all of them are animals evolutionarily” and that would be an anachronistic idea aside.)
Dragons are constantly showing modesty, flustered at nakedness, despite how they constantly fly around naked in their other form.
Dragons, despite being reptiles, are focused on boning in human form, including focusing on nipples and curves of a woman, instead of finding sex in their human state bizarre. Shouldn't a dragon go “oh, yeah, I like her scales” or “you know what they say about a long tail on a man...”? (Unless I missed some earth-shattering memo, I understand the intended audience is human and, thus, probably doesn't want to read dragon sex. But is jarring from an actual story standpoint.)
Dragons talk about having Gifts, but this struck me as very odd. It treats humanity as a baseline and that draconic gifts and abilities as not the baseline. Shouldn't dragons consider humans weird and weak creatures that lack key skills and senses?
Dragons having similar sexual mores to idealized human relationships, particularly marriage fidelity and mates and so on.
Dragon society being pretty much entirely like a human society, down to stuffy meetings with powdered wigs, except when it means dealing with dragon-human interactions, in which case it's “we're hiding from humans so we don't get murdered, take 1337.”