Richard Nixon's final book, written just a month before his death in April 1994. Given the time that it was written, and also Nixon's preference for discussing foreign affairs, and his penchant for focusing on Russia, he devotes much of his time here to discuss the post Cold War world and the U.S. has a unique position to lead the world in peace. Nixon clearly thought that, now that the USSR had imploded, the US was left as the one dominant country in the world and could assert its leadership in many different ways.
The word "terrorism" never appears here - showing just how long ago this was written. Because of that, the book feels dated, and in this respect it definitely is. Nixon apparently had no inkling that the priorities and concerns of the U.S. (and much of the world) would change drastically in just seven years.
Of course, Nixon always looked at the world through the prism of Russia and communism, and how the U.S. needed to resist it and fight it at every spot in the world. He justifies the Vietnam War on this basis, conveniently leaving out the thousands of soldiers who died in a conflict that ultimately ended in North Vietnam overrunning South Vietnam in 1975 after the U.S. pulled out. What he doesn't mention is that, largely because of the Watergate scandal that he was responsible for, the Congress cut funding to South Vietnam and helped seal its fate.
Interestingly, he warns of a resurgence in Russian nationalism and that the U.S. will have to make a concerted effort to protect the Eastern European nations from Russian expansionism. Furthermore, he presciently pinpoints Ukraine as one of the potential areas where Russia will want to regain control. Nixon really was an expert on Russian fears, motivations, and history. I do think that he tended to overstate Russia's influence in the world at large (Nixon viewed Russia as having influence on any nation that was not democratic in nature, regardless of global location).
The last roughly 40% of the book is focused mainly on domestic policy, is pretty much boiler plate Republican dogma: welfare encourages people not to work, universal health care would be disastrous, PBS should not be funded, and other such examples. Amazingly, he writes of healthcare (page 208): "Most people of the older generation in America grew up without health insurance....If patients could not pay for care, doctors provided it for free. But one way or another, patients got care and doctors got by." That seems like a generalization to the extreme. I wonder just how many people did NOT get care.
Ultimately, this book is full of "shoulds". One can just see Nixon wagging his finger as he warns of dangers (real and imagined). The tone is lecturing and also persistently conservative in domestic areas yet expansive in foreign policy.
Grade: D