A really wonderfully inventive book that to me at least presents a totally different way to approach narrative. As much a revelation to me as Ben Marcus was.
The book is split into three sections, which I think might be more useful a organizing heuristic than the short and fragmentary pieces that make up each section; the sections, then, group the stories more or less by setting and period, and the fragments are something like monologues that describe sometimes the action but often the environment themselves.
The first section is maybe the richest and most strikingly original in this regard, because it seems bounded by a single consciousness as well as the setting. As I was reading, I felt like I was being guided by a museum docent through a restored historical scene, sort of like you'd want when you walked around Vesuvius, maybe. There are lots of things the speaker seems to know about the German landscape of these first stories, but not everything. All of it is delivered in a more or less conversational tone, though obviously a conversational tone under pressure, making a deliberate presentation of what you are seeing, in a fairly academic tone and vocabulary. It's true, the docent would concede, that there were stories, dramas that played out here, but that is not our primary interest-- the story of Vesuvius is not that people lived ordinary lives there, but that those ordinary lives were disrupted by the volcano. I get a similar sense here, that I've entered an environment, and the goal of these stories is to help me to engage with that environment.
The language of the stories at the start reminded me of G Stein to some degree, maybe because the use of the academic jargon and odd word choice made me think of the plasticity of Stein's language, and the shared interest in domestic spaces and environments. But Schwartz' prose seems much more aware of a listener, the fact that there is an objective reality to present, and some subjects to whom that is being presented-- it doesn't make the transmission an easy one, by any means, and certainly the language is aestheticized. But I think it's aestheticized by the writer, not the ostensible speaker. Instead, the speaker hesitates, questions, and qualifies what s/he says, in ways that made me even more engaged in the tableaux I was being presented.
I'll concede this isn't a book for everyone, but for sheer novelty, this is one of the most exciting things I've read in a while. Accomplished, and very distinct.