This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
A huge feat of scholarship, which can be quite intricate to read at points. Terry adheres to the grammatico-historical sense of interpretation, along with an emphasis on ascertaining the context, scope and plan of an inspired author, before determining he meaning of a given passage. Having no qualifications in biblical exegesis, languages or textual criticism, I can hardly undertake to write a review. However, I note two interpretations Terry makes, one in limiting the prophecy of Matthew 24 to the destruction of Jerusalem rather than the final judgment, and also in viewing the Creation account, and the Flood, as being local rather than global events. These interpretations, particularly of the destruction of Jerusalem, have made me question what the true interpretation of these passages are.
A must read book for students of Theology and Scripture! The book is divided into three parts and each of them has comprehensive and detailed explanation, a very helpful source indeed. The author is soo briliant!
Exhaustive treatment in three parts - intro to hermeneutics, principles of hermeneutics, and history of interpretation. Earlier decades expected a much higher competence of biblical interpreters, and reading through chapters detailing the 6-8 languages that proficiency is expected in, and the number of ANE religions to be aware of is intimidating.
Terry is solid and skilled, defending the historical-grammatical method throughout, with an appreciation of typology that could use a little more nuance. He is strongest in prophecy and apocalyptics,but his chapters on science and scripture (where he argues for a local flood and a local creation) are so thunderously bad that I start to be suspicious of the apparently wonderful principles that he articulates earlier. His confidence in a rational system of interpretation wouldn't seem to make it unscathed through either a presuppositional or postmodern filter, and this is the direction I would push to find out how he muffed Genesis so badly.
His third section is very helpful for evaluating centuries of commentary, identifying key figures and their contributions, whether he agrees with their methodology or not.
Took this fairly fast reader forever to read, for whatever that's worth.
This is an advanced Hermeneutics book that covers all the norms of Hermeneutical topics and processes, but in greater detail and complexity than you'll find in most modern books. I did enjoy it but it was challenging to read -just as a book on general interpretive practices of the Bible ought to be. Terry's points and teachings are accurate and well thought out. It's an obvious culmination of a lifetime of learning.
This is a great resource on bible interpretation. Ironically enough, though the author articulates well the historical-grammatical method of interpretation, he is way off on prophecy, pre-millinialism, and the imminent return of Christ. I would give the book four stars, but this digital reproduction is horrid and nearly unbearable to read.
Somewhat tedious with some liberal higher-critical stuff thrown in. His preterist take on the book of Revelation was pretty good. Some good stuff on typology and symbolism too.