The essence of this book is not wrong. Being friendly to the people in your neighborhood and in your community is common sense. As Jesus said, "Matthew 5:47 If you are friendly only to your friends, how are you different from anyone else? Even the heathen do that." I have three neighbors who live close to my house, the two good neighbors are the atheist and agnostic. My problem neighbor? The Christian who goes to church every Sunday. My point: Jesus is right. Even the "heathen" know that it is common sense to live at peace with your neighbors. That's not a Christian virtue; it's common courtesy. Do I think the Christian church could use some training in that? Yes, in fact most Americans need a refresher in courtesy. 30 or so years ago one of our presidents said we need "a kinder, gentler nation." He wasn't wrong. But what this book gets so desperately wrong is the bible and the unique calling that is loving your neighbor the Christian way.
When Jesus was asked, (Matthew 22:36) “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” The Art of Neighboring totally, TOTALLY brushes aside commandment one to focus on commandment two. It then goes on to describe your neighbor as the person literally living next door. That is HUGELY problematic for several reasons. Here is just one: Matthew 5: 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven." When asked to define neighbor, Jesus gives us the parable of the Good Samaritan which shows us an enemy (Samaritan) being the neighbor. The book talks about giving a block party but look at what Jesus said about parties in Luke 14: 12 Then Jesus said to his host, “When you give a luncheon or dinner, do not invite your friends, your brothers or sisters, your relatives, or your rich neighbors; if you do, they may invite you back and so you will be repaid. 13 But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, 14 and you will be blessed. Although they cannot repay you, you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous.” I could give many more verses but my point is this: Our neighbors tend to be like us. Jesus knew that we could typically manage to love those like us. What needs doing is loving those NOT like us. This is where Christians stand out (or should). The book says: “Jesus says your enemy should be your neighbor. He says you should go out of your way to be the neighbor of someone who comes from a place or history of open hostility toward you or your way of life...we would define this kind of love as advanced or graduate-level love. The reality is that most of us aren’t at the graduate level; we need to start with the basics. We need to go back to kindergarten and think about our literal next door neighbors before we attempt to love everyone else on the face of the planet.” Bad news. Jesus said that those stuck in kindergarten don't make it into the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 25:45-46) An entire book could be written about where Art of Neighboring is theologically wrong but anyone familiar with basic scripture should know that at first glance. This isn't kindergarten Christianity; it's remedial humanism. Not a bad thing but not a faith thing, either.
Aside from my overall take that this book is NOT CHRISTIAN (again, not a problem, not all good ideas have to be Christian but all Christian books should be) is an attitude it takes towards social justice: From Chapter One: The ensuing discussion revealed a laundry list of social problems similar to what many cities face: at-risk kids, areas with dilapidated housing, child hunger, drug and alcohol abuse, loneliness, elderly shut-ins with no one to look in on them. The list went on and on. Then the mayor said something that inspired our joint-church movement: “The majority of the issues that our community is facing would be eliminated or drastically reduced if we could just figure out a way to become a community of great neighbors.” Later he explained that often when people identify a problem, they come to civic officials and say something like, “This is becoming a serious issue, and you should start a program to address it.” Frie shared candidly with us that, in his opinion, government programs aren’t always the most effective way to address social issues. He went on to say that relationships are more effective than programs because they are organic and ongoing. The idea is that when neighbors are in relationship with one another, the elderly shut-in gets cared for by the person next door, the at-risk kid gets mentored by a dad who lives on the block, and so on.
Two big problems here:
1. Most white middle-class evangelicals don't live among at risk families. They don't live next door to at risk kids or elderly shut ins. The few needy people that do live among them normally have a support network because they are middle-class and have social nets. The neighborhoods that do have needs tend not to have one or two poor people but a community of impoverished people who can't share what they don't have.
2. Money is often required to care for the at-risk/needy. I shovel a neighbor's driveway in the winter months because they are elderly, no problem. I have helped them in other ways, too. But taking them food, medicine, repairing their home? Those things need social solutions. Financially, my husband and I can't take on a second household. Fortunately, they (like us) are middle class and don't have those needs but my point is, if they did their neighbors could most likely not make up the shortfall.
This books also advances the idea of teaching personal responsibility to people who have tough issues going on. Not Christian, and frankly, most often not helpful.
Lastly, this approach to evangelism has been proven not to work. How often those seeker friendly programs need to be proven ineffective before being dropped by the church I don't know but the fact is that every time the reports come out on them they reveal the same thing. They bring no one to Christ and create zero disciples. We need to stick to what Jesus said does work: Good works. (Matthew 5:16 and a whole lot more.)
I think it is a great idea to get to know your neighbors, invite them to do things, evangelize if/when you can. But this is common sense, common courtesy living and should never, ever be mistaken for the gospel which calls for something greater.