Classic, 1995, HP, tycoon, alphahole, "enemies to lovers" romance
Leah's unconsummated, five-year marriage to powerful Greek tycoon, Nik Andreakis, is an empty sham, and she is determined to get a divorce. For the past three months, Leah has been sneaking away from her bodyguard and secretly meeting with Paul, a twenty-something man. She firmly believes she is in love with him, and that he is in love with her.
So far, during her affair with Paul, Leah has only been emotionally unfaithful to Nik. Though Paul has pressed her to have sex with him on multiple occasions, she has consistently refused. That is a step too far for her into violating her marriage vows. Also, it has not been at all difficult for her to hold Paul off because, as a virgin, sex isn't something she craves.
Leah is a prime example of the literary technique of an "unreliable narrator," because she is extremely naive. She does not realize that Paul is a conniving gigolo, even though, in an interesting use of the technique of dramatic irony, his presentation on the page makes that salient fact obvious to the reader. In a case of a silver lining to a dark cloud of deceit, however, Paul's false flattery has given Leah a confidence that she has never previously experienced in all of her 22, placidly cooperative years. That emotional boost, in combination with the fact that her father has recently died of a heart attack, has given her the courage to finally demand a divorce from her physically unfaithful, 30-year-old, Greek tycoon husband, Nik.
In another interesting use of irony, in this case, unconscious irony, though Leah seems to have been a complete doormat to her callously indifferent husband, she has stuck by him all these years, not because her teenage, worshipful adoration of him, which did not outlast the first six months of their marriage, after he rejected and abandoned her, but because of pride. She did not want to admit to her father what an abject failure her marriage has been. Unconsciously, because she is not into introspection, she feels both guilty and ashamed at how she got into this marriage. This is shown, not told, within flashbacks, by the fact that she never bothered to ask her father how he convinced Nik to marry her. Nik looked anything but delighted when he proposed to her, and there was a vast gulf between the two of them economically, socially, and in worldly experience. Last but not least, in the midst of her unexamined life, Leah has never admitted to herself the reality that, at an extremely unworldly age of 17, she was far too immature to get married to anyone.
This novel crosses a line in two directions as it violates the Prime Directive of mainstream romance: "Thou shalt not cheat." That prohibition exists because cheating directly violates the sacred goal of a romance novel, to convince the reader that the FMC and MMC are soulmates. The demonstrable proof of their soulmate status, in the rarefied, idealistic view of the romance genre, goes like this: If someone is your soulmate, you cannot possibly have any interest, whatsoever, either emotionally or sexually, in anyone other than your soulmate. (Which is aptly expressed in the immortal words of Paul Newman, regarding his perpetual fidelity to his beloved wife of 50 years, Joanne Woodward: "I have steak at home; why go out for hamburger?") If either the MMC or FMC is capable of being physically or emotionally unfaithful from the moment they meet, then the fictive dream of True Love is violated. (This issue also creates a fatal flaw in any version of a reunion romance, if either of the two lovers is involved romantically or sexually with anyone else during the length of their separation or, worse, the breakup was caused by one of them cheating.)
In this particular story, the MMC physically cheats multiple times after a marriage ceremony he was forced into, which led to a marriage which he did not consummate and did not feel any commitment to. As Nik states to Leah, with brutal frankness, he did not consider himself actually married to her before her father died, and he knew that the only way he could escape the marriage he was forced into would be if Leah herself left him. He was astounded that she stuck around when he neglected and abandoned her and acted like a single man. It was only logical for him to assume that she remained, against all odds, madly in love with him. And, of course, even though this is an "enemies to lovers" plot, and Leah is initially convinced that she hates Nik, it doesn't take long for her to realize that she, in fact, never stopped loving him.
In order to convince diehard romance fans to forgive Nik for violating the no-cheating mandate, in addition to the above excuses, the focus of this story, via the title and the opening scenes of the novel which Leah spends with Paul, is placed on her counterbalancing emotional cheating. Basically, the story stands or falls on the degree to which LG has persuaded her audience to go along with a type of blame-extinguishing, dual-revenge, "Two wrongs make it right."
Trying to live up to the extremely limited list of tropes demanded by the HP line is like trying to dance on the head of a literary pin and not fall off. Sometimes, extremely popular HP authors like LG try to mix it up a bit, as she has done in this novel. It was a risky bet to employ cheating, though, and a lot of fans have assigned this book 1 or 2 stars. I myself, as a devoted fan of LG, the first time I read this book, only gave it 3 stars. But on rereading this book and noticing all the clever artistry LG has displayed in pulling off an extremely challenging plot, in terms of the demands of both HP and the romance genre in general, I actually think she succeeded.
I personally don't tend to enjoy romance novels in which the FMC acts like a doormat. That's the main reason I don't like the vast majority of chick lit novels, because the FMC tends to be a doormat throughout 75% of the novel. If the FMC is going to be presented as a worm, which inevitably is a passive, boring protagonist, for my personal taste, that worm needs to turn ASAP. That's exactly what happens in this novel. All of Leah's worminess occurs in flashbacks. In the present-day, foreground events of this novel, she is actually quite assertive. In addition, LG has definitely delivered in this novel all of the emotional punch that is her trademark, and the entire reason that she, alone among all of the HP authors I've ever tried to read, that I have stayed faithful to following for the past 25 years.