Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Fashion & Architecture

Rate this book
Architecture has become a powerful tool in the fashion business. Perfectly poised and detailed shopping environments help to launch and build the corporate identities of the most conspicuous and prevalent fashion houses worldwide. As clothes designers diverify into all sorts of product ranges from homeware to sports gear, and expand in the the virtual world of e-commerce, the architectural image of built shops is becoming all the more apparent and all-pervasive.
Featuring interviews with high-profile architects Rem Koolhaas, Jan Kaplicky of Future Systems and David Chipperfield, and covering, among others, Comme des Garcons, Dolce & Gabbana, Issey Miyake, Prada and Yves St Laurent stores, this issue takes a close look at the relationship between fashion and architecture. It examines issues such as what role architecture plays in the formulation of fashion houses' identities, whether the line between fashion and architecture has become blurred, and if virtual shopping environments are intensifying the need to experience architectural space in the high street. Probing and far-reaching in its editorial content, Fashion and Architecture is the most comprehensive and high-quality visual record of current fashion retail.

112 pages, Paperback

First published February 14, 2001

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Martin Pawley

37 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (40%)
4 stars
0 (0%)
3 stars
1 (20%)
2 stars
1 (20%)
1 star
1 (20%)
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Mon.
178 reviews236 followers
June 12, 2011
Not worth it unless you're only going for the Charles Jenks/Rem Koolhaas interview, in which they both ditched Venturi. It's like an in-joke.

The writing is of Cosmo quality, the writer even managed to degrade David Chipperfield. But hey, it's easy to absorb. Why bother reading Eisenman when you can just look at pretty pictures? Maybe because it's completely forgettable.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review