Thirteen years ago, I snagged this book at a resale store in my hometown--that resale store has sadly since gone out of business. In 2011, I had never read a political book and was predominately focused on Harry Potter, Charlie Bone, and a couple other fictional stories. Fast forward to today, and this has become the ninth book (8 if you exclude the one that was his speech to Congress on September 20th, 2001) I've read about the last respectable Republican President of the United States. Yes--regardless of lingering objections from liberals and President Trump's most ardent supporters, that's my opinion.
Frum was hired on as one of the President's speechwriters even though he hadn't been too enthusiastic or initially supportive. After voluntarily resigning, despite false press stories, he wrote this book. It's nostalgic and even provides insight that wasn't in the other books that I've read about this President--but I'm ultimately conflicted. While the reader can definitely discern support for the President who served from 2001 to 2009, there's also very obvious dissent in places.
On pgs 126- 128, Frum delivered harsh and unfounded criticism of President Bush's oval office address on the night September 11th, 2001. He did the same thing on pg 240, down talking the President's defense of his second state of the union. The President had repeated his statements from the SOTU with which he agreed most fervently, and I don't see why this was a bad strategy in the war on terror. What was the President supposed to do? Cower and say he shouldn't have said any of it??? Thrown in unnecessary damage control??? Backpedaled and flip-flopped??? 🤦🏻 The final criticisms were on pg 282 where the supposedly supportive author and former staffer calls his former boss "unintelligible." 🤔
Ultimately, Frum sought to come across as a skeptic-turned-supporter who considered this President the right man (hence the title) to lead the country in it's darkest hour--but was also willing to lay constructive criticism at that same man's door. That affects my rating a bit, to be honest--by two stars. For the most part, though, Frum seems honest and sincere. He is not a supporter of President Clinton, which was made obvious by the mention of rumors that that predecessor and his staff willfully and purposely damaged or otherwise didn't take good care of the White House. There's a somewhat humorous story of how dirty and disgusting his office was on pgs 18-19. His wife's horror and subsequent assistance with cleaning is getting an honorable mention. 😆
This book is not as much a tell-all as much as it is a walkthrough. Frum did not piece everything together methodically to give you a picture of President Bush's first three years in office. He strung together important or relevant moments. Also, this isn't strictly about the President. It's really a 50/50 thing--half President Bush, half Frum's tenure; which isn't altogether a horrible thing... But I haven't finished this book with a very clear picture on what it was like to work in the Bush White House. This book triples as a conservative-ish commentary. It's readable, followable, and otherwise enjoyable despite the negative comments I mentioned two paragraphs ago. 3 stars.
Two random notes:
1. Interesting to see that the acronym POTUS had not only been a thing before Obama, but that it was also seen as ironically pompous--when now, it is the screen name of the incumbent President with most if not all social media presences. The acronym makes an appearance on pg 15.
&
2. Interesting coincidence. My fiancè and I just finished a book by Sylvia Browne called "Secret Societies and How They Affect Our Lives Today," where clandestine and covert were some of the most used words, and Frum used them both in one sentence on pg 143.