One of our other reviewers on the zine I edit, Films & Books, reviewed The Rocket's Red Glare for our magazine. He had read John Darrin's previous Screenshot, and gave it a 93 out 100 on his review. So, I had to try it.
He began his review with "too real and too scary" and that's about right. The subhead says, "Because it could happen." Well, that's what's scary. And really, I was scared, because this is written by experts in terrorism and nuclear industries, and they've virtually written a how-to book on how a massive act of terror could be perpetrated in the homeland.
There's no fluff here. It's somewhat in the style of grand thrillers, but has a flatter, almost journalistic tone to it. Which, by the way, I liked for this topic (I don't like terror topics to be glamorized more than they need to be, and I think the events are scary enough). Some readers might interpret that as stylistically spare, and I'd concur, but I think that's the right tone here. John Darrin and Michael Gresalfi were going for credibility points, and it comes across through a non-hyped prose style that dryly reports the unfolding events. When the plotline is this intense, the "reporting" on the events should not be intense, and that's what they've achieved.
In other words, they showcased the "what if" story-- rather than their own writing skills. There's no poetry here, but it's the right amount of spare prose for an undertaking like this.
It read like a retelling, by journalists, or a reconstruction by a non-fiction author, of a real event, a real terrorism event. And that's scary. If a reader's expecting deep character development, they won't find it here. This novel is more about the events, the scary events, that could lead up to this horrendous scenario. For real. It really could happen this way.
The concept of two completely non-aligned (and contradictory) terror groups working together against America is scary -- and plausible. A neo nazi racist group working together with Al Qaeda, doesn't seem likely in our lifetimes. But, what if -- the fiction writer's blessed "what if" -- what if these two groups "used" each other to target their own vicious agendas?
I read this right through in about 2 days. It's not the sort of novel to put aside, because it unfolds in virtual real time and that's how you want to read it. I gave it five stars because this type of novel, in the form of a "reporter-style" narrative (not exactly, but you get what I mean) doesn't call for, necessarily, deep character development — which clearly is the weakness of this novel. I'd normally drop a book to 3 stars for that reason alone. To me, character development is critical in most novels. Here, I just didn't think it was part of this genre... which, by the way, the authors are promoting as "forecast fiction" complete with a website to champion the new genre. I'm not sure it's that new an idea, maybe a narrow niche within an existing genre, but I get what they mean. The style is dictated by this "news reporter" style forecast fiction. It works. Is it my favourite style? No -- but here it worked.
Let me explain. If another author took this story line on, say a Stephen King or a Grisham, it'd be a different type of book. It'd be grand epic fiction, perhaps, but it wouldn't be, what I came to like here, which is that spare, flat reporter style. I'm not sure it'd work on a different type of story, but for a complex story, that involves dozens of characters (by necessity) I think it's just right.
Weaknesses: too many characters, hard to keep track of, no character development
Strength: plausible, scary, too real, and unique in style.
Recommendation: For thriller fans, a good read.