Plagiarism is not a crime but it is a civil offence. The punishment is mainly loss of reputation; a legacy ruined. Can it ever be a reason to kill or be killed? When Joanne Kilbourn bumps into the writer Valentine Masluck, she is surprised to recognise him as Val Massey a former journalism student of hers whom she hasn’t seen for fourteen years. Val had been one of the students under the spell of the charismatic lecturer and sociopath Tom Kelsoe, now serving 22 years for the murder of a fellow student and another lecturer. Val had been deeply affected by these events but now has an established reputation and has just finished writing the biography of Stephen Brooks, a previously undistinguished novelist who, after a prolonged period of writer’s block, suddenly produced two major, seminal and prizewinning novels which has secured his name in the pantheon of the greats, and assured a permanent legacy. There are unsubstantiated suspicions that Brooks must have had help in writing these, or even that he had plagiarised them. But, if that were the case, why has the collaborator or plagiarised person never come forward? Brooks is famously a loner, isolating himself from everyone including his daughter, Leah, who had been taken in and brought up by her aunts. By coincidence Leah is about to marry her long-term boyfriend, Angus, who is Joanne’s son. As the wedding approaches and Joanne becomes more enmeshed in the mystery (if there is one) of Brooks’s success, there is increasing likelihood that the situation might resolve explosively.
This is the latest in the Joanne Kilbourn/Shreeve series and it does refer back to previous events and people, but potted histories fill in any useful, and quite a lot of incidental, information. The incidental type is a feature of the series, because Bowen has created a hugely complex group of family, friends, acquaintances and passing strangers, around Joanne and her second husband Zack Shreve (a helpful list of the dramatis personae is included, as usual). Many of the books are, therefore, more family dramas than actual mystery stories in the usual sense (I have reviewed previous books in the series and alluded to the similarity to Soap Operas in that there are lots of characters and dedicated fans). This book is more “family” than most. Readers of crime stories/murder mysteries (even cosy style) will find this fairly unexciting. It is, however, well written, as are all the others, and enjoyable as a read. I think 2.5 stars as a crime story and 4.5 as an exemplar of the series, which make 3.5 and rounds to 4
I would like to thank NetGalley, the publishers and the author for providing me with a draft proof copy for the purpose of this review.