Contains invaluable extra-reading for Stanislaw Lem fans. Some reprinted reflection of his past work by Lem himself, criticism from Peter Swirski, and interviews between the two. Swirski seems most interested (I would go so far to say "hung up on") game theory, and what game theory means in Lem's work, and for Lem himself. I guess it was a trendy thing back in the day, and it seems like Lem was genuinely fascinated with this field, but today its just... not the most interesting thing about Lem's work.
Not what I expected. I have not read any Lem. I saw the movie Solaris and have read authors that list him as an inspiration. When I picked this up I thought it was an anthology of his shorter works. Instead, there's an introductory essay that is written in a way that assumes some familiarity with the author. I almost stopped reading that half-way through. The rest of the book are three different interviews that are dense and rambling, sometimes revealing plot twists and spoilers. The later interviews are more philosophical in nature and Lem repudiates or harshly criticizes some of his earlier works, particularly in his early phase of being naive and subject to strict censorship. A Stanislaw Lem Reader will not deter me from reading more of his work, but his work seems less important to me now than it was before.
This book is absolutely deserved complete reading and careful examine for it contains very much profound ideas that evoke comprehensive thinking about human and society.