Very cool history overall! That said, I feel like the first half of this was very poorly written. I didn't quite understand the origination of the knights, and then the section about the siege of Malta by the Turks was very, very long, but somehow still didn't give me the information I wanted. Joseph didn't provide context that I would want - 40000 Turks are in their armada - is that a lot? is that the usual amount for an armada? - or much of the human motivation. For example, one of the Turkish general's personal assistants betrays him to the Knights, which allows them to prepare for an attack...why would he do that? Joseph doesn't think that's relevant, I guess. Likewise, I can tell Joseph really, really applauds Jean de Vallette, but it's difficult to connect emotionally with the emotional moments - Vallette's tears, his bravery, etc. - without a solid emotional weight to the book.
As we move on, I feel like that's less and less of a problem, and I feel like I'm provided adequate context. The narration of Mustapha's betrayal of Grand Master Pinto, for example, has all the narrative elements I would expect. I think the history of this overall is very cool, it covers a vast span of centuries, plenty of social developments as we move through the modernization of Europe, the rise and fall of various men, countries, empires, all grounded around the focal point that is Malta. Lots of images, but often very darkly printed. I'm glad I read this, and I'm definitely more informed about the Knights of Malta than I was before. I would visit, even, if the opportunity arose.
I feel like this probably deserves four stars, but I'm going to give it five, because I vastly prefer the kind of amateur historian vibes of this than a more academic history. Like, I can imagine Joseph as one of those passionate elderly men that speaks for a bit in history documentaries.