This solid book comes out a little flat in the end. While it tries to explain what made Keith Haring so great, it doesn't quite complete the task. Same with the rollicking, promiscuous, utterly exhausting life that Haring enjoyed. It's documented here in ridiculous detail, but somehow it doesn't quite convey what it would have been like. Maybe the gap reflects the impossibility of putting into words what it would feel like to be drugged up for hours, dancing to music too loud to scream over, sweating with hundreds (thousands) of chic boys and girls. But I feel like many authors have given a better sense of that type of sensual atmosphere, even if they had to resort to over-the-top language and hallucinogenic metaphor to do so. Biographer Brad Gooch perhaps misses his chance by using plainer language even when describing the excesses of an outrageous time and place.
I lived in NYC during the last years of Haring's life and, thus, the height of his fame. I didn't pay attention. I was living uptown, and Haring was downtown. I rarely went to the Village, where he made his mark, and while I did pop in and out of Chelsea, which was a burgeoning artist area that he frequented, I went for more established music, not for the club scene. I saw Haring's artwork == his dancing people and giant hearts -- all over the place, though I don't know if any were original paintings, rather than commercial reprints. I wasn't a nightlife guy, nor was I an AIDS activist, so I trafficked in one of New York's many other giant circles of activities (in my case, academia and the Mets). Throughout the book I thought about the fact that I was a few miles north of the stuff going on in the latter part of the book but didn't pay any more attention than occasionally flipping through photos in some magazine abandoned on the subway. And, of course, I wouldn't have been able to get into any of the hip clubs anyway.
Despite me feeling like the book didn't fully capture Haring's energy, it is a spirited love poem to him. It gives a strongly positive perspective on him, both as a person and as an artist, and I get the sense that he didn't always get that respect when he was alive. The author quotes numerous snobby reviews of Haring's work that called him an illustrator, a populist, rather than a fine artist. This bothered Haring to some degree, but he also knew that he was pursuing a vision to bring art to the masses, and that was a worthy cause. This book does a great job of explaining how Haring did it and was an original at doing so, even though he also adopted the ideas of subway graffiti artists. Haring developed from his teenage years a series of symbols that he would work and rework all his life, showering them in brilliant colors like cartoons and 1960s sitcom furniture (which he loved) and bold, black outlines. These included dancing people, hearts, the crawling baby that was his signature, penises (lots of penises), farm animals, stars, flying saucers. He would labyrinth these on small panels of paper or cardboard, and later on huge canvases or tarps, filling every inch with icons in every direction. It was (and still is) arrestingly vibrant on first sight. And the best of the work delivers additional messages when viewed for longer.
Haring was prolific, doing a dozen drawings or paintings in a day, or covering a 300-square foot mural space in 24 coke-fueled hours. He didn't seem to repeat the same work, even though he was often using those same icons. He would add new images relevant to the setting or to comment on a current event, using his signature elements to emphasize a point. One example that I found fascinating about this approach is that Haring was either commissioned to do murals in children's hospitals or did them as charitable works over and over. He loved kids and ached that they were suffering. When he did these, he did hopeful scenes of love, animals, sunshine, and so on. But he wouldn't put his sex references on those murals because he didn't feel it was appropriate. While he was as "out" about his sexuality as a person could be, he felt there was a time and a place, and that people should have boundaries. Another example: his two longest lovers were young Hispanic men. But while the relationship with the second was fading, he met another Hispanic man who wasn't gay, and that guy became his companion and friend to the end of his life. But that man didn't sleep with Haring and said that he was accepted as a friend and soulmate without pressure.
The amount of work that Haring did is dizzying. He died of AIDS in his early 30s, and there are something like 10,000 original works of his. This doesn't even count all the chalk drawings on ad panels in the subway that were either taken down by authorities or later taken by collectors. Haring drew incessantly, whether tagging his crawling baby on a wall or passing out sheets on which he doodled a man to passersby at a restaurant. It seems like he walked around in a daze of vision, kind of like the way virtual reality headsets work today in "enhancing" what you see as you go down the street. Haring could do that on his own.
On top of that, he brought together the worlds of graffiti artists, who were mostly (not always) Black and Hispanic, with the downtown, educated art world. Haring didn't just admire graffiti artists; he sought them out, he shared their enthusiasms, he helped them and was careful not to appropriate their work, but to do his own thing. There are dozens of those graffiti and skateboard and rapper types who he helped and literally welcomed into his home and into art shows and parties, all in an effort to bridge divides. We take for granted the way pop culture is art culture and that pop culture can be monetized (commercials, sneakers, etc.). Keith Haring made a lot of that happen, building on the impact of Andy Warhol, one of his art heroes and a man he became close friends with. Haring's friendship with Basquiat also is detailed in this book, and it's given a positive gloss that, apparently, was viewed differently by the art media of the time. They tried to set the two men up as competitors, but really they were collaborators, admirers and friends. Haring basically only had friends.
The schedule that the author reveals of Haring's life, which Haring documented in diaries and which his small staff of assistants helped him to keep, is staggering. In a two-week period, he might fly to Paris for an opening of his paintings and in an afternoon paint a hallway for the art gallery, but also go to a hospital and do a mural. Then he'd party all night and take a train the next day to Germany, where he'd look over sites for a proposed mural. Then he would go to the Amalfi coast and spend a few days with friends, always reserving most of his attention to playing with their kids. And then he'd race back to Paris and fly home in time for an all-night dance party, and then the next day fly to Los Angeles to prepare for another opening. Really, he did this type of thing a lot. It's mind-boggling that he could handle the pace, let alone continue to evolve as an artist. You think about rock bands that go on tour for 200 days. They say they are so exhausted that they can't write good new songs. Keith Haring could do the equivalent.
If there's one sour note I have about this book, its that I found the listings of show openings and the people who attended them to be boring and repetitive. I don't care if Madonna or Steve Rubell went to such and such an opening, or that so-and-so collector bought a bunch of pieces and put them in her house. I realize why that's in the book, as it shows how Haring's circle encompassed both serious art collectors and the party-scene NY types. But there's just too much name-dropping in this book. I didn't find it interesting reading when I was in New York and it was happening at the time, and I find it even less interesting 40 years later.
On the other hand, the author's reflections on Haring's loving relationship with his parents is fascinating. He was different than them -- he grew up in the small town of Kutztown, PA, not far from Philadelphia. They were conservative and he was rebellious, smoking weed and doing LSD by the middle of high school. All he ever wanted to be was a famous artist, and while he had girlfriends as a teen he said it was obvious that he also liked boys. He left for art school and never looked back, doing things like a cross-country hitchhike trip with a girlfriend at age 19, and moving to NYC at 20. And he never told his family he was gay or that he was dying from AIDS. But at the same time, they knew he was gay and were kind to his boyfriends, and they supported him to the end, both coming to his openings, traveling with him once on a whirlwind Europe tour, and being with him on the day he died. They loved each other, even if they didn't quite understand each other.
And I think that dichotomy summarizes a lot about Keith Haring. He loved the world and the people in it, and they loved him back, even if they didn't fully understand the depths of his seriousness about art and his commitment to making the world a better place.