The popular, brief rhetoric that treats writing as thinking, WRITING ANALYTICALLY offers a sequence of specific prompts that teach students across the curriculum how the process of analysis and synthesis is a vehicle for original and well-developed ideas.
There are so many engaging writing tools in this book, and so many tools that are less formulaic and more generative than those found in TS/IS, that I plan to continue teaching this text as long as I continue to teach. (And I plan to continue teaching as long as KSU, or any university, continues offering me classes.) I've found several of the tools useful in my own writing; I have not found a better explication of what it means to paraphrase, nor have I encountered a more useful adaptation of focused freewriting; the authors outline six steps for focusing a freewriting session by continually returning to one key passage in a text, then sketching that passage's context, paraphrasing key words and interpreting the language that seems most crucial to the passage's meaning, and, finally, working out ways the passage connects to other sections in the text or to other passages from other texts. The authors also present a "Method" for locating strands of repetition and contrast in visual and print texts that takes a little work to get down but really proves useful in locating, rather than a "main idea" or gist, sections wherein the writer pitches ideas agaisnt each other. It's a useful way of reading and of shaping texts; I'd even consider using the Method in a fiction workshop.
I've had some diffiiculty helping students acclimate to the drastically different way this text's authors approach writing. They use the word "analytically" quite literally; thus, analytical writing proceeds from uncertainty and involves a great deal of evidence gathering and interpretation. Students used to summarizing and reading for a main idea with find this approach troubling. At least, a great number of my own students have had such trouble. I've found that it's necessary to have chosen a set of readings centered on, or at least loosely tethered to, a set of shared ideas; I have students then spend a week on each reading, using one of the analytical tools to try and break open a part of those readings. They work on assignments at home, using the explanatory passages from Writing Analytically as their guide, to make sense of difficult passages, locate points of tension and/or significant ideas, and to think through any problems they encounter as they read, or while they work to apply the tools to their readings. It's been a difficult time, but I'm receiving some fairly solid work from all my classes, and I'm convinced their writing will only get better as the semester progresses. And by "better," I mean more inquisitive, descriptive, deeper, and more developed.
Another read for my FYS. This is a basic writing book with tips and tricks to rethink the traditional “high school” way of writing for more sophisticated college papers. I really appreciated all the unique techniques, and some have changed how I approach writing prompts. It’s nothing ground breaking but a good basic introduction to academic writing!
This textbook provides activities that guide students to a more analytical frame of mind, encouraging deeper thinking and stronger ideas, as well as presenting strong organizational and practical strategies for presenting those ideas.
I was not sure of this book at first. The reader gets a better grasp on writing in small steps that we build on with each new chapter. If you enjoy writing, want to become better or just desire an extra dimension to your writing, give this book a try.
Never in my life do I want to see this book again. Great analysis methods are mentioned but the authors do not have solid pointers on how to execute them effectively in writing!!!!!!!
I haven't quite finished this book yet, but it has some valuable information in it. Like many of my fellows, I tested out of the intro-level writing classes, and this is probably one of the more unfortunate things that can happen to us, as many of us then only pick up by bits and pieces some of the elements that make good analytical writing and good rhetoric. While the tone is friendly and encouraging, the prose is nevertheless fairly dense and fairly dry, which makes for slow reading. Still, I wish I'd had to read this book when I was a freshman in college. Better yet, when I was in high school.
It took me so long to finish. At first glance, the organisation of this textbook seems loose: the reader may not know how to apply the various techniques introduced in the first half of the book. However, the analysis of the sample papers makes everything clear and illuminating.
I found this book beneficial. Much of it seemed obvious and I skipped over many of the exercises but it got me thinking more directly about how to read and write. A good refresher for anyone.