Stephen Tennant was an admirer and subsequently friend of the novelist Willa Cather; late in life, he befriended a Cather scholar, Patricia Lee Yongue, and invited her to stay for the summer at his country house, Wilsford in Berkshire (his neighbour Cecil Beaton referred to its chaotic ambience as ‘Miss Havisham gone berserk’). After a few days, he informed her that since he required solitude to create she should now leave. As she had nowhere else to go and had borrowed money to travel from America, his servants John and Mary Skull asked her to stay with them, which Tennant agreed to, and she was thereafter a regular visitor to the house. She had this to say:
I don’t think [Stephen] had the slightest real feeling for any of us, none that he acknowledged or even recognized. I’ve never had that experience before. I do not feel trifled with; I just felt odd that I spent so much time in Stephen’s house and in his presence and had not the slightest sense that he cared in any remotely human way for me. I established the normal, expected relationships with others I met through Stephen, including a wonderful one with John and Mary. But Stephen’s whole approach to me was performance.
Tennant is not then a ‘likeable’ character in any usual sense of the word. The term ‘narcissistic’ gets bandied about a lot these days, and if it can’t be applied to him, it might as well be taken out of the dictionary. He had charm, which seemed to work on most people, and in his youth was considered a beauty (not least by himself), and was sculpted and painted and photographed and written up in the gossip columns. As far as I can tell, his charm at that time consisted of the impact of his physical appearance plus the free and apparently guileless acknowledgement of his raging self-absorption and selfishness. Musing on a proposed group portrait in a letter to Beaton, he noted:
Competition for prominence will be a very touchy business I foresee... my tongue is already flickering like an adder, lest one iota of foreground be denied me – in fact I have suggested such a nice idea – i.e. – that I should recline in the foreground & behind me, knee deep in a Buttercup field, a group in the distance of you all.
I didn’t warm up to Serious Pleasures until its second half. Tennant as a Bright Young Thing isn’t terribly interesting, and I wondered whether his posing and preening merited any kind of biography, let alone one of this length. However, post-war Tennant, fat and strange and reclusive, aristocratically indifferent to the opinions of others, his peculiarities coming into full bloom as his house falls down around him, becomes bizarrely fascinating.
Judging from the examples we’re given, he was strictly an amateur practitioner of the arts (although he took his own work very seriously and knew a great many talented people): his sketches look like book illustrations or doodles for fashion magazines; his poems are embarrassingly bad; and I don’t think the world was deprived of anything much when Lascar, his projected great novel of the Marseilles waterfront remained uncompleted. Of all his artistic efforts, his decorated letter-writing seems to have been where he excelled, and he can be very funny (see the account of himself and a page boy shot through the swing doors of the Ritz by the blast of a nearby bomb ‘like Peter Pan and Wendy’). But his greatest work of art was himself, not as a youthful beauty, but as, in the words of Beaton, a ‘real and true eccentric with deep passions for the things he loves, living in a hovel entirely of his own making with… frenzy and zeal.’