Unlike what the subtitle suggests, this book is not a story about the physicist Richard Feynman based on his own words, as in prior books for the general public edited by his friend, fellow drummer, and son of a colleague, Ralph Leighton. Rather, it is about an eleven-year campaign to circumvent Soviet bureaucracy waged by Leighton, Feynman, and Glen Cowan to visit a country on the far south of central Siberia, next to the northwest of Mongolia, known during the 1977-1988 period of this book as Tuva ASSR (now the Tyva Republic of the Russian Federation).
The idea for the visit came from a challenge made by Feynman to the thirty-year younger Leighton, then a high-school teacher, about this country that Feynman knew from his stamp-collecting days as Tannu Tuva. Somehow both were quite surprised in finding that its capital's name was Kyzyl. To Leighton it was "crazy" that it did not have "a legitimate vowel anywhere" -- quite an ignorant remark by a teacher whose native language includes words like SYZYGY, flyby, gynny, glycyl, pygmy, nymphly, slyly, shyly, spryly, thymy, besides a hundred odd words with only a Y as the single vowel. To Feynman, agreeing with his wife's suggestion that they had go there, a place spelled that way had to be interesting. (The city, built between 1914 and 1917 on a spot called Vilany by Russians and Khem Beldyr by Tuvans, was originally named Belotsarsk, in honor of the tsar. In 1920 it was renamed Krasny Gorod [Red City] by the bolshevik partisans and this name, Kyzyl in Tuvan --which means red as in other South Siberian Turkic languages, just as kizil means red in Turkish--, became official in 1922.)
Their various attempts to implement this whimsical goal, commonly described as examples of impulsive adventurous spirit, are the story Leighton narrates. Here Feynman quite often only pops in and out the chapters, playing a secondary role in the activities in spite of being annoyingly referred to as "the Chief" in a nearly constant manner by Leighton. Some descriptions seem contemporaneous notes. Otherwise it makes no sense, say, for Leighton to use quotes in speaking of a _"space shuttle"_ about the first flight of Challenger [p. 87], at a time the shuttle program had been in actual operation effectively for just two years, but abandon the quotes for the same _shuttle_ when it exploded four years later [p. 132]. The book lacks updated information about some significant milestones of the story, which by 1990 would had been available from Tuvan visitors. An example is the obelisk claimed to mark the center of Asia, inscribed in Russian, Tuvan, and English, which he called their Holy Grail after seeing its photo in 1980 [pp. 35-36]. That obelisk was the third generation making such claim, and the first generation actually located in the gardens on a quay of Kyzyl, where the Great and Little Yenisei tributaries join forming the Yenisei river. Built in 1964 and refaced with granite in 1984, that obelisk is now gone, replaced by another with Scythian motifs in 2014.
A number of people helped in greater or lesser degree in this quasi stereotypical California '80s dream adventure. No-one surpasses Glen Cowan in that help. Fluent in Russian, he was finishing his B.S. in Physics at UCLA in 1981 when he shows up in chapter 3, and continues to appear in the remaining chapters playing an active role. In the narrative, the campaign takes a greater impulse after he joined it while pursuing a Ph.D. at Berkeley (he is now professor of Particle Physics at RHUL, and contributor to the ATLAS experiment [Higgs boson] at the Large Hadron Collider of CERN). Cowan provided the indispensable capability to read and write in Russian that the campaign lacked; contributed with ideas and suggestions; went with Leighton on trips to Russia and Sweden; and was one of the members of the group (with Feynman, Leighton and their wives) twice scheduled to travel to Tuva in trips that ended up being cancelled. A criticizable aspect of the narrative is the petty treatment that Prof. Cowan ultimately received from the people he had helped.
Despite that he could not but mention Cowan frequently in the book, Leighton is rarely as enthusiastic in recognizing the help as would be reasonably expected towards a doctoral student giving pro bono assistance. Except for a minimal in-passing mention, Cowan vanishes in the fourteen-page epilogue and 'Reflections 2000' addendum -- Leighton apparently considered more relevant to gossip about the French rabbit-fur coat a member of the Russian delegation got for his wife.
I consider deplorable that Leighton mentions Cowan [ i ] only *once* in his website Friends of Tuva (inactive as of 2014), a site described as _the central clearing house of information and Tuva-related merchandise_ on the alt.culture.tuva newsgroup of Usenet, and [ ii ] *none at all* in the new site carrying Feynman's surname. Just as bad is Leighton's 2018 blog piece 'Searching for Tuva: Before the internet and now,' where the robust manifold participation of Cowan is pettily minimized as "we recruited a linguistic wizard named Glen Cowan to help." Oh, come on.
Quite more appalling in this respect has been Feynman himself in his speech for the opening of the USC's exhibition "Nomads of Eurasia" (as edited by Leighton in Appendix B of the book) and the video interview made for BBC TV Horizon "Feynman: The quest for Tannu Tuva (1988)," in both which the role of Cowan is never mentioned, despite it can reasonably be argued that without him the exhibition and subsequent invitation to visit Tuva would had hardly come to fruition, if at all. Besides the ingratitude, the video is inescapable proof that Feynman knew Cowan was involved in the Tuva campaign as it shows, at time 26:12 and 26:28, photos of Cowan, Feyman, and Leighton standing next to Leighton's car displaying a TOUVA license plate.
Given that this is a historical book sensu stricto, and Feynman mostly only pops in and out the story, it is important to contrast its narrative with what Feynman says about the story in the BBC video. That is not easy, as he nearly always uses a broad brush and Leighton often slips into pointillism. But it is clear that Leighton's narration in pp. 85-87 disagrees with Feynman's narration. Feynman ambiguously mentions as if it were coming from him and Leighton the idea to take a photo of him making it look like he is pushing the car (time 26:03 of the video, and p. 86 of the book) to send it to their friend Ondar in Tuva. Leighton's narrative, however, acknowledges it was Cowan's idea to take photos of them with Leighton's car plate to send to Tuva, and adds that: [ i ] Cowan advised against sending the false photo; [ ii ] it was the photo at 26:28 in the video, where all three are standing next to the car, the one that was sent to Tuva; and [ iii ] it was not sent to Ondar but --as originally planned by Cowan-- the Tuvinskaya Pravda newspaper in Kyzyl, along with a Lunar New Year greetings note written in Russian by Cowan that was published with the picture by the newspaper. That Cowan was a peer in the campaign is clearly established by the greeting note, a part of which can be seen in the photo at 26:28 saying in Russian: "We, residents of the state of California Ralph Leighton, doctor Richard Feynman and Glen Cowan [...]."
Though Leighton's narration sometimes suffers from irrelevant tangential skids, more often than not this is an entertaining book in that it highlights oddly byzantine Cold War policies and Soviet delusions (and hints of vestiges of seemingly McCarthyst pre-1992 fears of looking like a USSR sympathizer, as exemplified by unnecessarily defensive explanations of why someone would read Pravda or want to visit a place in Russia). Leighton and Cowan are the primary architects of the Tuva campaign edifice that consumed so much of their time, while Feynman has a sidekick role in a whimsical pursuit of secondary importance for him given the events in his life at the time, which conflicts with the commanding role he paints for himself in the 1988 BBC video.
Readers who worship Dick Feynman's anecdotes about himself will likely see the Chief's hand behind the actions of his associates and will enjoy the book. But readers who, despite admiring his creative scientific work and --in these days of experimentally unbound theoretical physics-- his insistence on the rigorous experimental testing of hypotheses, are not indiscriminate devotees of his anecdotes (especially those focused on emphasizing his own high opinion of his brilliance) might evaluate the book in a different light. Not recognizing people whose results of significance are useful to ourselves is tantamount to appropriating their work. And this is what occurred in Feynman's video and, in lesser degree, in Leighton's mentioned writings.