Two virtues mark out this novel as one of extraordinary strength – story and narrator.
The story is that of the 1975 Indonesian invasion of East Timor, the bloody suppression of its left-wing administration and supporters accounting for more than 200,000 lives, and the at times equally merciless guerrilla warfare waged by opposition forces that ensued.
The names are lightly disguised; even Portugal, the former colonial power, is referred to only as ‘the Home country.’ But the specificity and the outrage could not be clearer, nor the blame for what happened.
‘What Fakoum [the fictional East Timorese ruling party] did in its short life .. has never been relevant so much as what the Americans and the malais [invaders] said Fakoum would have done,’ we are told. And just three pages from the end, there emerges another motive for Western encouragement of the take-over.
The plot is full of incident, chiefly during the long central chapter following the guerrillas’ [never called ‘freedom fighters’] flight and campaign in the jungle and mountains of the interior, culminating in an unexpected climax and a resolution of sorts.
That meticulous account would be sufficiently interesting and vivid in itself to commend the book, but what gives it extra weight is the character of its narrator, the homosexual Chinese hotel-owner turned bomb-maker Adolphe Ng.
Abused, self-deprecating, accommodating, calculating, he is by turns horrified and grimly fascinated by all he witnesses. Even before his abduction and forced recruitment by the rebels, we get a sense of the man in his not unkind but seignorial treatment of his vulnerable staff. ‘My peons were young people .. A lucky one might share my bed for part of the night.’ Lucky for one, maybe.
Ng has had a liberal education, studied in Toronto, played a leading part in an intellectual group debating modern literature. Yet this is the man who becomes in his own words ‘the Leonardo of guerrilla warfare’, devising explosive devices calculated to cause maximum suffering rather than quick death.
He is nauseated by the killings, but able to give his testimony in a clear voice that avoids any element of special pleading. It is honesty that hurts and makes on grieve for the man. Of the infants who were among those who died of starvation on the long march, he writes: ‘I don’t count those. They were the product of the liaisons between the fighters and the washerwomen. … We didn’t notice or, to be honest, care. They’d never been people, except perhaps as a theological point.’
Ng is caustic in his criticism, but always a criticism that includes himself, as when he describes East Timor politics. It was not democracy, ‘we [note the pronoun] operated the politics of the grudge.’
One can imagine Timothy Mo researching the story from the many non-fiction accounts of the conflict, but to this he adds a string of sharply differentiated characters, the brave, charismatic Osvaldo and his contemplative brother-in-arms Martinho, the idealistic but soon to be disillusioned Raoul and his bad poetry, the heroic Maria and Mrs Goreng, the upwardly mobile but not unsympathetic Mrs Goreng, wife of a malai colonel.
I had not particularly liked Mo’s earlier Sour sweet and An insular possession – both also short-listed for the Booker Prize – although a gripping read, was at times long-winded in its structure of verbose 19th Century newspaper extracts.
The redundancy of courage therefore surprised me as perhaps the finest account of guerrilla warfare, the reality of a conflict by definition normally hidden from view, I’ve ever read. A perfect alliance of story and story-teller.