I really struggled through this book. I was expecting something along the lines of how London grew from a Medieval city into a a massive metroplex incorporating slums and gated communities. This book is disappointing to that extent. It revolves around the biographies of 8 men who contributed to the greatness (?) of Victorian London.
John Nash, Marc and Isambard Brunel, Thomas Cubit, Joseph Paxton, Charles Barry, Joseph Bazalgette. Edward Watkin, and Alfred Waterhouse all contributed to the expansion of Victorian London. Arguably, only Bazalgette really contributed to the city proper. The rest of the group were focused on either buildings for the wealthy in the suburbs or massive civic buildings like museums or the Great Exhibition in Hyde Park. Apart from the chapter on Bazalgette, and his construction of sewers and embankments, there was very little discussion on the city itself. Waterhouse's Victorian Gothic style did spread far and wide, so there is a good argument for including him.
Halliday has great enthusiasm for his subject matter. But his writing assumes that readers are already familiar with the neighborhoods, landmarks, history, and appearance, and importance of everything he discusses. It is not easy to envision the importance of Gibraltar House in the West End as a sign of urban planning by the shady developer John Nash. More can be said for the father and son Brunel team building tunnels under the Thames. But somehow, Halliday does not carry on the significance showing that the companies could not make a profit from the new tunnels. The lack of profits also plays a key role in the chapter on the irascible Edward Watkins. Oh the poor stockholders!
Victorian London and the making of a city has so much material to work with. Yet somehow this became an almost unreadable book. It did not help that the text was surrounded by call-out passages that simply repeated lines from the text. More call-out boxes offered one-paragraph biographies of other people who sort of contributed (good or bad) to the efforts of Halliday's heroes. Ultimately, this reader only took an interest in Bazalgette who appears to have accomplished Herculean endeavors. He certainly did more for London than the people designing mansions in Belgravia. Until this book, I had never heard of Belgravia or Pimlico. Their significance is lost on this reader.
Overall, this book is less about the making of Victorian London than it is about showcasing 8 architects from the era. It is almost like the book is in search of a topic. Jumping from land speculators to the Great Exhibition / Crystal Palace, to the Victoria Embankment, to something about trains, to Victorian Gothic style, the book hops around. Is it about London or these 8 architects? The result is a mishmash of topics with poor transitions and reader empathy. Tunnels, sewers, land reclamation, museums, mass transport are all important to building a metropolis; but such contributions are often lost in ramblings about Watkins fighting other tycoons [?] low returns on shares of stock, and other hardships for these architectural heroes. Perhaps the problem is that material is condensed into too few pages; although if it was much longer, I doubt I could have finished it.