I just finished reading this book, “Paradise Lot: Two plant geeks, one-tenth of an acre and the making of an edible garden oasis in the city” and I enjoyed it a good deal. The author, Eric Toensmeier and his roommate Jonathan Bates, tell the story of their purchase of a tenth of an acre with a duplex in Holyoke MA, and their 5+ year process to turn it into a self-sustaining, edible ecosystem. At times getting really into the weeds (hee hee hee!) about their choices of what to plant, where, when and why, they show how a knowledgeable and creative approach, respectful of the natural order of things, can successfully guide an ecosystem to be healthy, beautiful and productive. Within 5 years of planting they were growing and harvesting pawpaws, berries, apples, grapes, peanuts, groundnuts, “yamberries” and raising chickens all on one-tenth acre which had previously been hard-scrabble urban fill and compacted clay.
Another quality of the book I appreciate is Toensmeier’s ability to remain, on the whole, politically neutral and to concentrate on the inner workings of the garden itself. Bates, in his contributions, waxes a bit more and rhapsodic, but altogether they focus on encouraging community and small scale oriented changes rather than wasting their time on the more typical environmentalist spiels about mega-systems and international orders and corporations and such.
Finally, what most sticks with me are these two excerpts from one of the last chapters:
“As a budding ecologist in the 1970’s and 1980’s, I learned that the best we can possibly do as environmentalists is to minimize our impact on nature. The ideal footprint would be no footprint at all. That doesn’t really give us a lot of room to breathe, and with that as its model it’s easy to see why the environmental movement has not won wider acceptance. The most profound thing I have learned from indigenous land management traditions is that human impact can be positive – even necessary – for the environment. Indeed it seems to me that the goal of an environmental community should not be to reduce our impact on the landscape but to maximize our impact and make it a positive one, or at the very least to optimize our effect on the landscape and acknowledge that we can have a positive role to play.”
“I’m all for hammocks and fruit, but I’m learning to embrace the idea of gardens that need us not to toil against weeds and bugs but rather as part of the ecosystem, to hold the rudder and help steer nature in a direction of delightful abundance and elegant complexity.”
Especially that last paragraph seems to me to embody a truly Catholic ideal of both the nature and dignity of human work and its relation to the environment.
Take as a whole the book also highlights why so much of our agricultural practice is destructive and ultimately exploitative not just of the environment but, which is much more important, of other people. The approach described in this book requires a deep knowledge and love of their little miniature ecosystem, and of all the plants that made it up, informed by a love of the community they were building and a desire to share the abundance that they knew the earth was capable of with others. It requires work, understanding, patience, and trust. It is much simpler and easier to strip the ground bare, plant it with all one kind of seed, spray it with chemicals to kill all other kinds of plants, spray it with more chemicals to kill all the insects (good and bad), to harvest by machine or underpaid labor, and then to sell it on the hope of breaking even with enough left over to put food on the table and pay the mortgage.
This leads to my final point about this book which is that the authors do not recommend that everyone cease their agriculture practices, burn down the agri-business and return to an urban-hipster-perma-agrarian way of life. They are practical and sensible in realizing the costs, risks and possible outcome of a permaculture system. They are aware that only the fact of an established and intricate economic network enables them to have the time to devote to their hobby and to make it as successful as they were able to make it. Their self-proclaimed goal is to build a foundation of mistakes and lessons learned from them in the hopes that in 20-years their successes will be regarded as obvious and simply take for granted, while other interested people can build on their knowledge and experience to build communities and networks of communities growing more food in a more sustainable way.
Altogether, I enjoyed it, it has given me a lot to think about it, and as my family plans an eventual move to some land of our own, we will be giving a permaculture approach a hard look and some serious thought.