What do you think?


Montaigne en mouvement
Au départ, il y a cette question posée à Montaigne - cette question que Montaigne pose lui-même : une fois que l'individu, dans un accès d'humeur mélancolique, a récusé l'illusion du paraître, quelles exériences lui sont-elles réservées ? Que va découvrir celui qui a dénoncé autour de lui l'artifice et le déguisement ? Lui est-il permis de faire retour à soi, d'accéder à l'être, à la vérité, à l'identité intérieure, au nom desquels il jugeait insatisfaisant le monde dont il s'est écarté ? Montaigne met à l'épreuve cet espoir en composant les Essais. Mais "la prise et la serre" seont-elles possibles ? Si les mots et le langage sont, au dire de Montaigne, "une marchandise si vulgaire et si vile", quel paradoxe que de composer un livre et de s'essayer soi-même au fil des pages écrites ! L'on ne sort de l'apparence que pour s'engager dans une nouvelle apparence.Montaigne voit le doute s'étendre jusqu'au point où nulle opinion n'offre une garantie supérieure à celle de la vie sensible. Par le détour de la réflexion sceptique, il réhabilite le paraître, rétablit la "relation à autruy", reconnaît les droits de la coutume et de la finitude. Ce mouvement réconcilie la pensée avec ce qu'elle avait d'abord rejeté ; la condition humaine, malgré toute sa faiblesse, peut être le lieu de la plénitude.
- GenresNonfiction
608 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published January 1, 1982
About the author
Jean Starobinski
138 books43 followersJean Starobinski studied classical literature, and then medicine at the University of Geneva, and graduated from that school with a doctorate in letters (docteur ès lettres) and in medicine. He taught French literature at the Johns Hopkins University, the University of Basel and at the University of Geneva, where he also taught courses in the history of ideas and the history of medicine.
His existential and phenomenological literary criticism is sometimes grouped with the so-called "Geneva School". He has written landmark works on French literature of the 18th century – including works on the writers Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Denis Diderot, Voltaire – and also on authors of other periods (such as Michel de Montaigne). He has also written on contemporary poetry, art, and the problems of interpretation. His books have been translated in dozens of languages.
His knowledge of medicine and psychiatry brought him to study the history of melancholia (notably in the Trois Fureurs, 1974). He was the first scholar to publish work (in 1964) on Ferdinand de Saussure's study of anagrams.
Jean Starobinski is a member of the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques (a component of the Institut de France) and other French, European and American learned academies. He has honorary degrees (honoris causa) from numerous universities in Europe and America.
His existential and phenomenological literary criticism is sometimes grouped with the so-called "Geneva School". He has written landmark works on French literature of the 18th century – including works on the writers Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Denis Diderot, Voltaire – and also on authors of other periods (such as Michel de Montaigne). He has also written on contemporary poetry, art, and the problems of interpretation. His books have been translated in dozens of languages.
His knowledge of medicine and psychiatry brought him to study the history of melancholia (notably in the Trois Fureurs, 1974). He was the first scholar to publish work (in 1964) on Ferdinand de Saussure's study of anagrams.
Jean Starobinski is a member of the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques (a component of the Institut de France) and other French, European and American learned academies. He has honorary degrees (honoris causa) from numerous universities in Europe and America.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Read
April 22, 2016"Montenj u kretanju" je standardno dobar Starobinski tj. vrlo ozbiljno (i na mahove šarmantno) fenomenološko čitanje Montenja, dušu dalo za onog ko to voli. Opomena: prevod vrlo rđav, na mahove gotovo nečitljiv, a za nas nepametne koji ionako svaku rečenicu moramo po tri puta da čitamo dodatna muka.
August 29, 2023
Beautiful prose, empty thought. And i could have done without that whiny, whingeing sort of cringe rightwing bullshit about Montaigne’s “politics” (if you want to call it that) at the end.
August 16, 2026
This is a book which you will love it or hate it.
As you see, I love it. It is a book which I need to read to go deep in Montaigne’s essays even I don’t agree with all Starobinski’s thoughts and thesis. Reading it is like a wandering in the strange forest, it needs time, free mind (how to be free when you have to work?), and openness to strange ideas and connotations.
As you see, I love it. It is a book which I need to read to go deep in Montaigne’s essays even I don’t agree with all Starobinski’s thoughts and thesis. Reading it is like a wandering in the strange forest, it needs time, free mind (how to be free when you have to work?), and openness to strange ideas and connotations.
August 19, 2012
Den här boken har inspirerat mig väldans.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews





