Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology

Rate this book
First the Seed spotlights the history of plant breeding and shows how efforts to control the seed have shaped the emergence of the agricultural biotechnology industry. This second edition of a classic work in the political economy of science includes an extensive, new chapter updating the analysis to include the most recent developments in the struggle over the direction of crop genetic engineering.

1988 Cloth, 1990 Paperback, Cambridge University Press
Winner of the Theodore Saloutos Award of the Agricultural History Society
Winner of the Robert K. Merton Award of the American Sociological Association

425 pages, Paperback

First published April 29, 1988

10 people are currently reading
172 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
18 (30%)
4 stars
25 (42%)
3 stars
10 (16%)
2 stars
5 (8%)
1 star
1 (1%)
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
Profile Image for Anna Groover.
222 reviews37 followers
October 25, 2017
3.5/5 stars.

Read this for my capitalism and nature class. I really enjoyed the first half of the book--the history behind agriculture and seed proliferation is fascinating and an entirely hidden history that we often don't think about. I got a little bit bored with the second half of the book; it was mostly the recent history of biotechnology patents and developments, a lot of which I was already familiar with thanks to my high school biology class's big focus on biotech (we did an entire month on it!).

At the end of the day, I enjoyed this book quite a bit. I applied to college as a biotechnology major; First the Seed made me thankful I did not stick with that.
16 reviews
July 14, 2009
Argument: "the agricultural plant sciences have over time become increasingly subordinated to capital and . . . this ongoing process has shaped both the content of research and, necessarily, the character of its products" (8).
Profile Image for Will Connelly.
27 reviews3 followers
January 29, 2016
Great research, very boring read. Pray you never get assigned this book by a professor.
Profile Image for Mitchell.
43 reviews11 followers
November 4, 2017
3.5ish honestly, but the content was great so it was rounded up. A dense but interesting read. Probably would have been much more enjoyable if I didn't have to shotgun it over 3 days for class.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.