This monumental study is a comprehensive critical survey of the policy preferences of the American public, and will be the definitive work on American public opinion for some time to come. Drawing on an enormous body of public opinion data, Benjamin I. Page and Robert Y. Shapiro provide the richest available portrait of the political views of Americans, from the 1930's to 1990. They not only cover all types of domestic and foreign policy issues, but also consider how opinions vary by age, gender, race, region, and the like.
The authors unequivocally demonstrate that, notwithstanding fluctuations in the opinions of individuals, collective public opinion is remarkably it reflects a stable system of values shared by the majority of Americans and it responds sensitively to new events, arguments, and information reported in the mass media. While documenting some alarming case of manipulation, Page and Shapiro solidly establish the soundness and value of collective political opinion. The Rational Public provides a wealth of information about what we as a nation have wanted from government, how we have changed our minds over the years, and why.
For anyone interested in the short- and long-term trends in Americans' policy preferences, or eager to learn what Americans have thought about issues ranging from racial equality to the MX missile, welfare to abortion, this book offers by far the most sophisticated and detailed treatment available.
Benjamin I. Page is a Gordon S. Fulcher Professor of Decision Making at Northwestern University. He is also a Faculty Associate at the Institute for Policy Research. Page holds a PhD from Stanford University and a JD from Harvard Law School.
Page works on American politics and U.S. foreign policy, specializing in public opinion, democratic policy making, the media, and economic inequality. He is best known for his work (with Robert Y. Shapiro) on the “rationality” of public opinion: the general stability, coherence, and responsiveness to new information of Americans’ collective policy preferences. He is currently studying the political attitudes and behavior of wealthy Americans – the top 1% of U.S. wealth-holders – investigating how they often disagree with average citizens but tend to get their way in policy making. Page’s past civic involvement has been limited, but he is now committed to helping Americans understand the barriers that stand in the way of democratic responsiveness.
I thought this was a good read on the trends of public opinion between 1935 and 1990. Seeing as it is now 2013, I really would like to see an updated version. The authors argue that the media helps share public opinion (of course!) and the media has certainly changed a lots since 1990 - 24 hr cable news channels, internet, social media. I can take a guess at how these new media impact public opinion, but it would be great to read a thorough review of their impact - and how it differs from pre-1990.
i’d have enjoyed this more if i wasn’t so jaded from having to read so much for this class but overall pretty ok. kinda repetitive, kinda dragged, but a good concept to explore. i’m just a lippmann hater so this is # perf.
Are American voters irrational? Are they incapable of living up to the ideals of democratic citizens? Page and Shapiro are optimists. This book provides data to suggest that the public as a whole is not a collective fool. It was published nearly two decadfes ago, but it has lasting relevance for debates over the competence of the public in a democracy.