Found this after googling "The Process" during a highly caffeinated Sixers-related research session one day. The Process refers to Sixers GM Sam Hinkie's plan to pull the team out of mediocrity by clearing cap space, developing unheralded young players, establishing a hardworking, fun, trusting culture/environment, and accumulating draft picks by trading current established veterans (and MCW, the previous season's Rookie of the Year) for future picks, using aforementioned cap space to absorb overpaid/underperforming veterans plus picks in exchange for helping teams bail out from bad contacts (eg, Javale McGee's $20 million/year), and most importantly/infamously running out on the floor a team of young nobodies -- guys like Hollis Thompson, Brandon Davies, Henry Sims, undrafted free agents (TJ McConnell), a D-league MVP (Robert Covington), super-bouncy athletic second-rounders who can't shoot (Jerami Grant, Jakarr Sampson), and former first-round players who hadn't panned out (James Anderson, Thomas Robinson) -- and have them compete hard without the stabilizing veteran rotation player presence (formerly Tony Battie, Elton Brand, et al.), all in order to secure a top-5 pick in the draft, ideally the one thing all great teams throughout NBA history have had, something the Sixers hadn't had since Allen Iverson, something teams can only acquire through the draft or free agency (before they built their new world-class luxury home-base in Camden, no one wanted to come to Philly and practice at the Philadelphia Osteopathic College of Medicine on City Avenue, the only team in the league without their own training facility/headquarters): a superstar or two.
A few years after The Process began (with the trade of Jrue Holiday for Nerlens Noel and a future first-round pick that became Dario Saric and their own future first-round pick that had been lost in a bad trade to draft Arnett Moultrie two years before and that ultimately netted the Sixers the #1 overall pick in the 2016 draft, Ben Simmons, two years after they added the #3 overall pick in the 2014 draft, Joel Embiid), the Sixers now have two likely superstars (Embiid is already an all-star starter and Simmons should win Rookie of the Year and develop into a perennial MVP candidate), last year's #1 pick Markelle Fultz (currently injured/bizarrely jacked shooting form), next year's Lakers pick (currently around #10), and enough cap space to add a difference-making small forward, maybe someone like Lebron James. As a Sixers fan since the days of Darryl Dawkins (pre-Moses, I mean), I was very much in favor of The Process, following its intricacies more closely than I had regular season games in the past, in part because it was such a rational, analytics-driven, longest-view-type plan that ultimately had as its goal not making the playoffs every year (and losing in the first or second round, thereby drafting in the middle teens and getting stuck every year with very good players like Thaddeus Young) but drafting and developing game-changing players who can ignite the city and lead the team to the finals at least. But I think I was also attracted to it because it was about rationally overcoming the OBSTACLE of mediocrity (losing in the first round of the playoffs or just missing out each year) and winning championships (multiple NBA titles, ideally). And so the Sixers turned their obstacle (losing) into the way (losing intentionally/pragmatically in the short term, all to increase their long-term chances of winning).
So I've been a little bit interested in The Process over the years -- and then last week googled "The Process" and for the first time considered that Kafka's "The Trial" is actually called "Der Process" in German -- and also I read something about college football coach Nick Saban's "Process," which led me to this book, which I ordered on a whim. I also like reading things like this (pop science/psych, self-help, etc) every once in a while, gleaning whatever the lesson is that will be repeated a hundred times and seeing how the authors go about structuring a book like this. This one takes Stoicism and Aurelius's Meditations and delivers it like "Stoicism for Dummies" but in updated, attractive, readable form. It's structured into three parts (perception, action, will), with each part having between nine and twelve short chapters, each beginning with a quotation, followed by an anecdote from some famous person (Edison, U.S. Grant, Lincoln, Earhart, Gandhi, MLK, Richard Wright, George Clooney, etc), followed by some abstraction on the topic, followed by more quotations, followed by second-person coach-like clipped encouragement-type sentences, often ending with a bulleted list of summarized tactics to help us deal with the obstacle ahead of us, whatever it is. It's a quick, painless, at times thought-provoking read (again, it's basically a collection of quotations and anecdotes), a great model for anyone interested in reducing a classical philosophy to cherry-picked historical stories and aphorisms followed by vernacular translation directly addressing the reader.
I also now know that when confronted by an obstacle, as long as I proceed with complete attention and energy, all my armies deployed, I can choose to go around it, go in the opposite direction, use the obstacle's energy against it, confront it head on with persistence and try to outlast it -- that is, for every obstacle there's like fifteen different contradictory responses possible. But it's interesting to think about in terms of the Sixers' Process and Kafka's "Before The Law" parable, where the traveler wants to gain access to the Law but the door is blocked by a guard with a huge Tartan beard who talks about dozens of other doors beyond his, each blocked by more terrifying guards, and so the traveler begs, pleads, bribes, and then falls silent and waits patiently for the guard to let him in until one day he realizes that he's grown old and somehow no one else has ever come also seeking entry to The Law and so he asks the guard about this and the guard says because this door was only for you and now I'm going to shut it.
The guy seeking entry to The Law in Kafka's tale maybe should've read this book. Sam Hinkie, however, could probably write a better version of it.
Anyway, an atypical read that's made me want to find that copy of "Meditations" by Marcus Aurelius I have somewhere and that seems more valuable as a model for how to write something like this than a self-help obstacle-overcoming handbook in itself.