Oh, to be a 1920's adventurer out there "discovering" the world. Their lives are like nothing anyone else experienced at that time, and even less so like the lives of people living today. I can not imagine how incredible it must have been to see all these incredible places and to have the opportunity to teach others about what you've seen, and about the varying differences in culture around the world. I just wish, that the Johnsons hadn't been so clearly stuck in the philosophy of their time. By this I mean, the racism which saturates the way that Osa talks about the people of Borneo and Africa whom they meet, and additionally even the self-deprecation with which Osa discusses women in her time (both the village women she meets and the white women of the U.S./herself).
A few example of the ease with which racism percolates through her language include:
"Chief Hadji was taken into our confidence, and the careful instructions given to the natives by that gentleman (for such he was, even though to all intents and purposes a "primitive")..." (173).
"All were Kikuyus, just one degree removed from savagery, and still wore skins dyed with red clay" (203).
Despite spending years living with people of color, her belief in racism never seemed to waver, even when she could recognize these people as human, having beliefs and dreams, she still remained to see them as lesser. Something which was also proved when she recognized her husband's task of caring for the porters he was responsible to care and provide for, as being less important than his responsibility to the Museum of Natural History and other rich people who invested in their trip (275).
Additionally, she continued to recognize those who traveled with her husband and herself on their safaris as people almost closer to animals than to people. She considered them as responsible for doing all the work of the trip, be that the job they signed up for or something her husband demand they do. For example, at one point they essentially force their chef to build safari houses for them, and resent his saying no as being disrespectful to their whiteness, when really its disrespectful for them to force him to do a job other than what he is willing to do. They care more about their image as white people than their treatment of black people.
Osa even says at one point; "Too lazy to build huts for themselves, the black boys lay around a camp fire with only one thin blanket each to protect them from the cold nights" (227). When if she actually recognized them as humans she would see that they had all already worked to build huts for her and her husband and really THEY were the lazy ones. Later, they even charge their workers a "hut tax" (265) even though the people built the damn things themselves and the Johnsons didn't do shit.
Osa can't even respect the native people for the things they have been doing since before her ancestors gained their pale skin, because when three boy scouts are invited to join them on safari she says, "The porters were quite awed by the boys; not merely because they were white, but more particularly because there was no native feat of skill at which the youngsters did not prove more proficient than the native himself" (317).
And then there's the shit this woman says about native women,
"Here is the case with nearly all primitive people, a woman does not count in the scheme of things except as a slave, to do the work of the village and bear the children, and all this with kicks and abuse for reward" (134).
Which is simply uneducated for her to say, considering she doesn't know anything about the many different cultures of Africa and is also judging them from her outside eurocentric view which itself doesn't value women and treats them like dainty little children. God, how much I hated when she said, "I made it an invariable rule to keep my hair well brushed and arranged, and to give as much attention to manicures and beauty treatments as though we were in the heart of New York rather than in the depths of so-called darkest Africa" (252). Like being pretty remains her only true job in life.
In relation to sexism, the only line I hated more than that one was, "He treated me exactly as though I were a young and slightly unpredictable daughter and never could seem to get over what he called my "pink-silk-dress-little-girlness," as contrasted with my ruggedness on safari. My husband always laughed when this came up and said he had married me young and trained me that way. And so he had!" (299). I'm honestly disgusted by her lack of self-respect in considering her husband as having taught her how to be a women, how to express herself. Not to mention how gross of an idea it is that he married her when she was so young and malleable.
"My husband went right on, piling up such a weight of masculine logic against my wholly feminine illogical tears, that I should have been crushed with humiliation" (271).
What a dream of a husband, am I right ladies?
Additionally, it was hard to read about someone who's had so many opportunities in life and is relatively super well off, but is still so uneducated about the world she's out there seeing. Outside of her eurocentric beliefs I've already covered, she's also super uneducated about the animals she's seeing.
For example, the first time she sees elephants she recognizes them through the lens of seeing circus elephants and practically tries to walk up and touch one:
"The big fellows were so exactly like the elephants I'd seen in circuses that I wanted to go right up and feed them and pat their wrinkled trunks To walk toward them seemed the most natural thing in the world to me... when they wheeled suddenly and faced me, however, and their trunks went up in alarm and their ears stood straight out from their heads, that was something else" (264).
She isn't even aware of the long periods of cruelty which circus elephants are subjected to in order to make them subject to humans. And then later, un-educatedly thinking she's helping elephants out she starts haphazardly planting watercress in any water bed she sees, thereby helping introduce an invasive species to Africa, which remains a problem for native species today (279).
Not to mention, the fact that they claim to be there to simply photograph the animals in their natural state, but continuously rile up the animals "for the photo," and keep making dangerous situations in doing so, which often results in them "having to shoot the animal." Like get off your high horse, you are solely to blame for the fact the animal had to be shot.
In fact, the only educated thing Osa ever puts in her book, comes in the form of another person,"He had a brusqueness of manner that at first was a little disconcerting, but this wore off after a little and we saw that it grew out of a downright exasperation with the so-called big game hunters who came, in increasing numbers, to fatten their egos with trophies, no matter how obtained, and whose lust to kill would in time become a menace to African wild life" (203).