It took me more than a year to finish Doreen Valiente's 165 page book. I was really hopeful that Valiente would provide an enjoyable read because Valiente is respected in the community for her role developing the Wicca religion to what it is today. However, Valiente, in this particular piece, is very much just like all the other new age writers (Crowley and Gardner included) – racist, misogynistic, homophobic, and frankly just absolutely incapable of doing proper research – perpetuating falsehoods and lies as fact.
Where was the good that I saw (the quote below) in the rest book? Where was this person who was going to clear the air around bullshit in the community? Where was the content? Certainly not here.
"[I wrote this book because...] I wanted to show people that magic is for all, as nature is for all. Magic, indeed, is all around us, in stones, flowers, stars, the dawn wind and the sunset cloud; all we need is the ability to see and understand. We do not need to join high sounding 'secret' fraternities, swear frightful oaths and pay fees, in order to become magicians. Very few fraternities are genuinely old and still fewer have any real secrets to impart. Still less do we need to buy a load of expensive paraphernalia, such as ceremonial swords, wands and so on, which can be seen advertises for sale today.
Magic is meant to help people, including yourself. The priggish notion that 'you mustn't use magic for yourself, only to help others' is a piece of sanctimonious waffle that is entirely modern. "
(p. 11, Natural Magic, Doreen Valiente)
Is this book really about natural magic?
No, unfortunately it is not. Valiente did write around natural items – like dreams, herbs, animals, colors, … some planets. She did talk about … certain stone formations which have relevance in the sex section of this review. In addition, she has a very specific notion of what “nature” is and how humans interact with it.
On page 57, she goes into a whole tirade around modern civilization (or as she said “modern so-called civilization”) and about how we just need to get in touch with the green plants of nature. It's really not the only time that she goes in about how humans are “separated” from nature living in “civilization.” This is a clear warning sign that her understanding of nature is very “controlled” and “safe.” But also very particularly – England, farmland and hills. There's a whole conversation that this idealism is driven by colonialism, whiteness, and baked into a cultural attitude of “human have domain over animals and plants” which originates out of Valiente's least favorite religion - Christianity. But definitely, Valiente kept as she interacted with the world around her in the Christian society that she grew up in.
I was surprised to see that Valiente's notions around farming and agriculture. But greatly disliked “animal sacrifices” and dismissed it as evil. But then she referenced hunting rituals and english past times which talks exactly about using animals for food. A lot of the charms and things that came up in these sections, are about ensuring that you can get to the next harvest. All of that? Includes examples of her own cultural animal sacrifices. It's harder to “let these” small things go when she focused so much of the sections on them, and she was squeezes fingers together slightly this close to finding self awareness about her own prejudices.
So let's jump into it - sex.
For me, I was expecting the same bullshit I get from a lot of occultists, especially those writing from a Wiccan perspective that “fertility” is just an ideal around productivity or being able to produce things like art or crafts or the fields will be full of food - and not about sex. What I found in this section, was a very clear message that Valiente is DEFINITELY about sex. But only in a very particular form and a particular manner.
Where that form and manner is about the “IO” shit (penis and vagina). The random English stones that Valiente sometimes mistakes which one is the “penis” and “vagina.” Fundamentally, sex - for Valiente - is penetrative and heterosexual. Valiente definitely has the shadow of her cultural upbringing around sex being a thing that happens just in a “marriage.” A Christian, Church of England marriage. Rest assured - She is bitter that Christianity didn't let her fuck outside of marriage. Bitter.
But she doesn't let up from the idea that sex should only be “one man” and “one woman.” That the two should never separate as a consensual monogamous relationship that is formed in a magical ritual and chosen by astrological decisions. If it sounds a little Christian to you – let me confirm it did to me too. The shadow is hard to escape when you never really wanted to leave it.
Valiente is very detailed when it comes to sex because more than once she describes the sexual fluids of humans mixing together to create the Elixir of Life [aka pregnancy in case y'all are wondering] (p. 85 - p. 88). She explains in great detail about how the rituals of nudity will bring forth this sexual comingling of fluids. Once those fluids are created you can use them by wiping them off into leaves and sticks to use for magic. I'm just saying, Valiente is clear. Sex is about sex. Fertility is about sex. Sex. Fucking. Sex. And I will hear no amount of careful denials from here on out when I have exact page quotes from Valiente about how sex is a prominent part of ritual magic.
And before I get called out about page 86 – yes, she does mention that it's not all “necessarily” about sex. That the nudity can just amount to kissing, fondling, and embracing – the focus however is still about a “comingling” of auras. Which again.. is very sexually based. Penetrative sex is not necessarily the only kind of sex there is.
But don't worry, Valiente is a prude and is most DEFINITELY not sex positive. She especially does not like the idea that you could just have sex with anyone, as she takes issue with how Crowley fucked prostitutes to do his magic (p. 98-99). And she explicitly is against anal sex because Crowley does have anal sex, and she finds anal sex to be gross - because of his “general obsession with nastiness.” She makes sure to assure all of us that we do not have to have sex acts in our magic like Crowley. But make no mistake, she wants you to have a singular, heterosexual, and at least at some point vaginally penetrative sexual partner in your magic rituals.
Indeed - She was a white British lady after all...
The majority of the sites and locations that she talks about within the book are in and around England. In fact, she has things like the cultural practices (Morris Dancing) mentioned peppered throughout the book (though she made sure to tell us how not “air-fairy” [aka homosexual] it is, and how virile it is). As I mentioned before, she talks about those stone configurations. She also talks about the Uffington White Horse. It's clear that she is very familiar with different pockets of the English countryside and unique things that are definitely a part of the English culture.
But one other “unique” characteristic of English culture, she has a ton of racist shit in here. Whether it's her referencing the “good” white witches multiple times throughout the book (versus the evil “black witches”), or whether it's about her cherry picking from random cultures to pad her book with nonsensical shit to attempt to make a through line of justification for her ideas on magic. It's all in there, very English, very traditional. (p. 15-17, 69) just to pocket a few pages with these examples of her using whatever she could find in different cultures from Egyptian, Greek, Indian, Native Hawaiians, Native Americans, various other Asian sources, etc. She's very sure that you'll just understand if she randomly quotes about “ancient” cultures having you know... kinda sorta the same practices, beliefs, faiths, ideas - maybe?
Finally - just for funsies, we have a whole reference to how the New Forest witchcraft group attempted to reject Hitler from Britain, a whole memory of the bombed out sites in England while she was there, but that didn't stop her from having an entire conversation in the numerology section of this book about how dang Hitler was psychic from p 47 to p. 48. You would think she wouldn't have a fondness for Hitler, and yet, here we are. Fondly thinking about him. I digress, racist shit is natural in these new age occult books and perpetuating it is just easy. So maybe this book is about natural magic after all, naturally... racist... magic.
In sum total, this book was super problematic. I didn't even cover half of the gendered issues, the fact that we have all this random Transcendental magic in this book without a proper discussion, or the fact that I particularly dislike when books quote whole cloth from other material without adding directly to the discussion at hand. I will say I did appreciate the citations which were more than I've seen in other new age books. Indeed, there was that Thistle Jar meme wherein the Thistle will just cure my depression and I will just warm my ass with it. I really wanted this book to be more than it was, and here we are stuck in it with another bad new age book.