What do you think?
Rate this book
The Mosaic Polity (Sources in Early Modern Economics, Ethics, and Law) by Franciscus Junius (28-May-2015) Paperback
This treatise, appearing in English for the first time, engages the perennial question of how the laws of Moses ought to be applied to contemporary political situations. Through clear distinctions and theses, and by drawing on diverse sources ranging from Greek and Roman law to medieval Christian theology, Junius develops a method of classifying and interpreting the Mosaic laws that honors both their particular Jewish context and their universal and perpetual significance. Junius’ Mosaic Polity also reveals the interdisciplinary nature of early modern theology, law, and politics, and the influence of Junius’ treatise and method is evident in such Reformed political luminaries as Johannes Althusius and Abraham Kuyper.
Paperback
First published January 1, 1593
11 people are currently reading
109 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13 reviews
February 5, 2025
Good but very dry. Like, brittle. But helpful and a must read in light of all the CN discussions happening right now.
The introduction was really insightful.
The introduction was really insightful.
April 23, 2025
Junius, Franciscus. The Mosaic Polity. Tr. Rester, Todd. CLP Grand Rapids, MI: CLP Academic, 2015.
I have long criticized theonomists for their ignorance of Reformed teaching on natural law. To be fair, however, if they were to start with this volume they might end up even more lost. If Junius is strong and clear in the big picture, he gets lost in the details. In order to make headway with this volume, one needs to be familiar not only with Aristotle, but with basic philosophical categories that were common until modernity: genus, species, and ends. Little of what Junius says will make sense if those are not understood.
Divided into some thirty-odd theses, Junius identifies the nature of law and the place of the Mosaic code in it. That seems clear enough. What is not always clear, however, is to what degree the Mosaic code is applicable today.
Law, for Junius, is the ordering of reason to the common good. The genus is ordering and the species is reason. From this definition he divides law into eternal and natural. One is tempted to create a Ramist chart of his definitions, and that works to an extent. But there are difficulties. Natural law is separate from eternal law, yet it also participates in eternal law. The Mosaic law on one hand is an application of natural law, yet since it comes from God it seems to be divine. I think the solution is to ignore the problems that arise in the particulars. Junius is strong enough on the big picture and that is what we should focus on.
Since the Mosaic law is from God, it is perfect in origin but imperfect in mode. It has mutable and immutable parts. It is immutable concerning common notions and eternal reason. It is mutable regarding ceremonies, circumstances, and particular determinations. What parts then remain? If one can find, for example, an analogy of right between the Mosaic code and today’s laws, then that remains.
Natural law, on the other hand, advenes to nature and exists in time, though participating in God. The natural law, as it pertains to society, can be subdivided into common notions and particular determinations. The common notions, known to our Puritan forebears as “koinia ennoia,” are what they sound like. They remain constant throughout the ages. The particular determinations are the applications unique to this or that society.
Evaluation
Junius perhaps raises more questions than he answers. Structuring his argument around various theses was wise, but even then he sometimes made his task more difficult than was necessary. A good thesis is short, having a proposition and making a claim. Some of Junius’s theses ran to near-paragraph length. Even more, some of his theses seemed to summarize earlier points. Again, the best way to deal with such communicative difficulties is to ignore them and focus on the big picture. He succeeds in answering what law is. And even if he is not always clear where the Mosaic ends and the natural begins, he is clear in his use of natural law terminology, and that can prove most instructive to the reader.
I have long criticized theonomists for their ignorance of Reformed teaching on natural law. To be fair, however, if they were to start with this volume they might end up even more lost. If Junius is strong and clear in the big picture, he gets lost in the details. In order to make headway with this volume, one needs to be familiar not only with Aristotle, but with basic philosophical categories that were common until modernity: genus, species, and ends. Little of what Junius says will make sense if those are not understood.
Divided into some thirty-odd theses, Junius identifies the nature of law and the place of the Mosaic code in it. That seems clear enough. What is not always clear, however, is to what degree the Mosaic code is applicable today.
Law, for Junius, is the ordering of reason to the common good. The genus is ordering and the species is reason. From this definition he divides law into eternal and natural. One is tempted to create a Ramist chart of his definitions, and that works to an extent. But there are difficulties. Natural law is separate from eternal law, yet it also participates in eternal law. The Mosaic law on one hand is an application of natural law, yet since it comes from God it seems to be divine. I think the solution is to ignore the problems that arise in the particulars. Junius is strong enough on the big picture and that is what we should focus on.
Since the Mosaic law is from God, it is perfect in origin but imperfect in mode. It has mutable and immutable parts. It is immutable concerning common notions and eternal reason. It is mutable regarding ceremonies, circumstances, and particular determinations. What parts then remain? If one can find, for example, an analogy of right between the Mosaic code and today’s laws, then that remains.
Natural law, on the other hand, advenes to nature and exists in time, though participating in God. The natural law, as it pertains to society, can be subdivided into common notions and particular determinations. The common notions, known to our Puritan forebears as “koinia ennoia,” are what they sound like. They remain constant throughout the ages. The particular determinations are the applications unique to this or that society.
Evaluation
Junius perhaps raises more questions than he answers. Structuring his argument around various theses was wise, but even then he sometimes made his task more difficult than was necessary. A good thesis is short, having a proposition and making a claim. Some of Junius’s theses ran to near-paragraph length. Even more, some of his theses seemed to summarize earlier points. Again, the best way to deal with such communicative difficulties is to ignore them and focus on the big picture. He succeeds in answering what law is. And even if he is not always clear where the Mosaic ends and the natural begins, he is clear in his use of natural law terminology, and that can prove most instructive to the reader.
April 23, 2025
Junius' perspective on legislation and biblical law differs significantly from my own. He argues that a legislator, with knowledge of eternal law and the matters governed by laws, has the authority to create and change laws for the common good. Junius considers the laws of Moses the "perfect example" of human laws but maintains that we must continue to create and modify laws based on biblical principles. While Junius' work provides valuable insights into the development of legal thought, I remain convinced that legislating crimes based on natural law is unnecessary and contrary to biblical principles of justice and the purpose of civil government. I discuss more in my book, Seven Statist Sins - https://a.co/d/j79g7tO
July 29, 2015
A very good read, and helpful to understanding the Westminster Confession, chapter 19. Recommended!
July 10, 2015
A judicious discussion concerning how to distinguish between which parts of the Mosaic law apply today and which laws were mutable and particular.
June 4, 2023
Reformed Theologian Franciscus Junius has written one of the foundational texts for Protestant political theory. Junius asks how we make good and just laws. How does a Christian commonwealth rule? How does the Mosaic Law of the Old Testament relate to Christians today?
This book is a contender for being the Protestant equivalent of Aqunias’ Treatise on Law. It is also an early example of Scholasticism used within Protestant theology.
It is a difficult, but rewarding text to read on natural law, the divisions of law, and a useful framework for reading the Mosaic Law of the Old Testament
4/5 Challenging but rewarding book
This book is a contender for being the Protestant equivalent of Aqunias’ Treatise on Law. It is also an early example of Scholasticism used within Protestant theology.
It is a difficult, but rewarding text to read on natural law, the divisions of law, and a useful framework for reading the Mosaic Law of the Old Testament
4/5 Challenging but rewarding book
December 8, 2024
Not a very easy read, but essential for the topic. Junius gets to much the same conclusions as a Theonomist (at least a general-equity Theonomist), but he gets there with better math. In fact, he gets there more Biblically.
The fourfold categorization of law into Eternal, Natural, Divine, and Particular or Human Law is incredibly helpful. And it is also noteworthy that Junius does not have rigid lines drawn between moral, ceremonial, and judicial when dealing with the laws of Moses, but recognizes that many laws are deeply mixed, and so we need to carefully distinguish those parts that are mutable, and those which are immutable. Fantastic, and very helpful.
I liked it a lot.
The fourfold categorization of law into Eternal, Natural, Divine, and Particular or Human Law is incredibly helpful. And it is also noteworthy that Junius does not have rigid lines drawn between moral, ceremonial, and judicial when dealing with the laws of Moses, but recognizes that many laws are deeply mixed, and so we need to carefully distinguish those parts that are mutable, and those which are immutable. Fantastic, and very helpful.
I liked it a lot.
May 18, 2021
This book is a great treatise on formulating a position on the Natural Law in a distinctively Protestant formulation. Junius’ method is impeccable. I only wish he was consistent in applying it to the mosaic law. In his distinctions of the immutable and mutable aspects of the law, he , for example, categorizes capital punishment in instances beyond capital murder to the immutable aspect of the law. While surely his teachers Calvin and Beza had an influence on him, his inconsistency in applying his method is the primary weakness of his work.
Read
August 12, 2023One of the densest books I've ever read, especially at the start. I definitely didn't completely understand all his arguments, and I'll need to reread it at some stage. That said, some great stuff - a lightbulb moment for me in the final chapter was that the judicial laws are to the second table as the ceremonial laws are to the first table.
February 18, 2025
Great work explaining how the Mosaic civil laws still apply, (via natural law filtered through human law). This is a good critique of reductive theonomic applications and dispensational (maybe even Marcionite) neglections.
May 9, 2017
Great! Important stuff. The preface was a great piece of political theology.
August 9, 2022
Very thoughtful non-theonomic study of the Mosaic judicial laws from a leading Reformed scholastic theologian.
Very heady, but good.
Very heady, but good.
July 15, 2021
While I'm glad a translation of this work exists, I did not find the book very helpful. Although I can appreciate that Junius, as Rester points out in the intro, intended his work to be merely rudimentary and prolegomenal, I think that the work leaves too much unsaid. In particular, while Junius spends a lot of time arguing for the traditional threefold division of the Mosaic law--the moral, which is eternally binding, the ceremonial, which is now obsolete, and the judicial, which is merely instructional--he does not lay out sufficiently clear principles for discerning which laws fall into which category. Rather, he appears to leave these kinds of determinations to the judgment of "plain reason" (though, as he himself acknowledges, how particular Mosaic laws are to be categorized is not always a matter of "common sense," particularly when distinguishing between moral and judicial laws).
All in all, I think someone interested in the topic of how/whether the Mosaic law applies today, and how that question has been answered in the past, should look elsewhere.
All in all, I think someone interested in the topic of how/whether the Mosaic law applies today, and how that question has been answered in the past, should look elsewhere.
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13 reviews