The Eagle and the Lion: The Tragedy of American-Iranian Relations

by James A. Bill

A leading scholar of Iran relates the reasons that helped to destroy the American-Iranian relationship and outlines measures to improve future foreign policy-making

Genres: Iran, Middle East, History, Politics, Nonfiction, International Relations

520 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1988

Reviews

[Alish · Rating 4 out of 5]

با وجود گذشت حدود 40 سال از انتشار کتاب، هنوز مطالب تازه‌ای داره.
کتاب بیش از اینکه درباره تاریخچه روابط دو کشور باشه، سعی داره توضیح بده که آمریکا در قبال ایران کجای راه رو اشتباه رفت؟ منظور نویسنده این نیست که امریکا اشتباه کرد و ایران/ایرانی نکرد. اما به عنوان یه دیپلمات، معتقده که تجربه روابط با ایران، درسهای مهمی برای دیپلمات‌های آمریکایی داره.
جایی که بیشتر توجهم رو جلب کرد، چند فصل پایانی کتاب بود که درباره طرفداران شاه در امریکا و شبکه روابط شاه در بین سیاستمداران امریکایی و همچنین ضعف‌ها و ناکارآمدی‌های سفارت امریکا در تهران حرف میزنه. بخش زیادی از کتاب متکی به مصاحبه‌های نویسنده با دست‌اندرکارانه که لابلاش اطلاعات خیلی جالبی یافت میشه.

[Dimitri · Rating 4 out of 5]

If a tree falls in the woods when nobody is around, does it make a sound?

the Iranian revolution, growing from below the pro Pahlavi elite which in turn isolated the U.S. both within Iran and in the concerning federal departments of Washington, was like that.

James A. Bill was one of the academic Iran specialists of the 60s-70s, which both peppers his work with delightful anecdotes and a sense of mea culpa; it is not clear from writing in 1988 whether he was ahead of the curve.

The entourage of the U.S president in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief and the regime controlling the Islamic Republic are at war in March 2026. I hope somebody will soon explain to me in a similar vein how blind both sides are this time around. Probably the Mossad will get the paranoid overextended credit the CIA 'enjoyed' ever since Mossadeq.

[Robert Sparrenberger · Rating 4 out of 5]

My dad and I have an ongoing joke that the people who need to read books like this never have or will. This book definitely fits the bill. A very detailed look at relations between Iran and America specifically between the years of 1950 and 1979.
The author has an excellent summary of twelve points that caused the situation in Iran to head south quickly. Unfortunately, American foreign policy today sounds more like lines form action movies than any constructive discussions with other countries.

[Craig Werner · Rating 2 out of 5]

Got some information about what was happening in Iran during the 1960s--the part of the book I read--but beyond that, not impressive. The book bogs down in the details of personal relationships between Iranians and American diplomats, pop psychology about LBJ, with a lot of repetition. The moral is clear: the US made a hash of its relationship with the Shah. Still looking for a source that goes deeper.

[Andrew Keen · Rating 4 out of 5]

The Eagle and the Lion is Professor James Bill's well-rounded study of American and Iranian relations from pre-WWII to post-revolution in the 1980s. Professor Bill draws together several themes and how they develop and are related between the US Government, the Shah of Iran, and the people of the mosques and bazaars of Iran until the culmination in the 1978 revolution.

The late Professor Bill was one of my college professors and I took his Persian Gulf Politics class in the Spring semester of 2003 at The College of William & Mary. His passion for the people and politics of Iran comes through in this book, as well as his well-reasoned criticisms of US Government policies. Having listened to him and read his book, I believe that Professor Bill thought that the US was a force for good in the world, even if it was sometimes misguided.

Themes that Professor Bill draws out are Iranian distrust of US intelligence agencies, commercial interests in selling arms to Iran, powerful individuals influencing US policies who believed that Shah to be an immovable ally of US interests, the superficial understanding of Iranian politics by US foreign service officers, and competition between the CIA, State Department, and National Security Council to form US policy and pursue competing interests.

This book is not written for the mass market; it is academic in tone and requires some persistence to get through it. I think it requires more than one read to fully understand its message.

[JL · Rating 2 out of 5]

The author seems to be very knowledgeable of Iran, but his delivery is as dry as the desert sand. He makes a valid point that the US made several foreign policy blunders in dealing with Iran; however, his argument comes across as fairly lopsided making the author appear as an apologist for post-revolutionary Iran and Khomeni. The book does not contain a single entry regarding Iran’s state support of terrorism, which has been a major obstacle in the US normalizing relations with Iran. Some interesting info but it’s a labor to read.

[Katie · Rating 2 out of 5]

Fairly detailed and economic. Not that it isn't well done; just not the sort of book I like to read cover to cover.

[Msmathews]

The author was a student of my friends son ... just won the Pulitzer prize!

[Kristine]

Paykon, my coworker, said this seems to tell both sides better than the other book - so to read them in tandem.