Overall, I really enjoyed this book. Hewitt isn't afraid to pull punches and tells readers things they should and shouldn't be doing and character traits they may have that he would recommend they just put down the book, as it isn't for them.
He efficiently lays out a lot of good advice relating to jobs, conversations, work environments, money, and a host of other things with a viewpoint of trying to influence the world for Christianity. A lot of the advice seems standard and obvious, such as "Unless you own the company, you can be replaced," but much of it bears repeating, such as don't say negative things about coworkers behind their backs. He identifies the type of person who can get in and influence the three distinct centers of thought in America: Los Angeles for culture, New York for business, and Washington, D.C. for politics. Starting with college and where you choose to go, he gives advice and pointers for all of your career decisions until you are old enough to be a mentor.
I like the style, the efficient writing, the short chapters. His advice from credit cards to conversation tips is all good. If I have kids, I consider giving them this book while they are still young enough to start from the beginning and telling them to pick a path.
It's not a book on things permissible to Christians, things not permissible to Christians, how to find a job you love. It is completely about gaining influence in the three areas. So while tattoos and dreadlocks might not be a sin, he points out that looking out of place and doing something out of the ordinary like that will often sabotage your efforts to be taken seriously in a serious world.
However, he is an interventionist when it comes to foreign policy. He basically says that as a free country founded on Christian beliefs, we need to battle evil overseas to give them the same freedoms we have and that in turn will make it easier for us to spread the Gospel. I think his view on war seems a little naive. Evil isn't always a clear definition and as often as not, good isn't either. Take Syria. I was falling for the "poor rebels, they're just fighting against their oppressive government" view and someone told me that things aren't always that black and white. And sure enough, it turns out the rebels are using chemical weapons and associated with terrorist organizations, and care about killing civilians about as much as the government is said to. Neither side is good. So should we have gone into a war over it? I don't think so. Also, the idea that we can just go in and remove evil just like that is simplistic. Whenever we go in, civilians die. A conflict of war, maybe. But if we invited ourselves in, then not only are we going where we aren't wanted, but causing the same pain and suffering we were supposed to be freeing them from and creating animosity along the way. Just because we think that democracy and freedom of religion is the best doesn't mean they think it is the best... and maybe you can remove their "evil" head of government and force them to democratically elect another one... but if the people don't believe in democracy, and the people in power don't believe in democracy, how will it last? And if you "free" a strongly religious nation, who's to say that they will grant religious freedom? Or just turn around and make their religion then only allowed religion? And in some cases, like Egypt, they had a democratically elected leader, who was then ousted by the military.
I think he has it backward on cause and effect. Yes, I'm sure freedom of religion would be helpful when it comes to spreading the Gospel. But this country was founded as a Christian nation with that as one of its values. You can't simply march into another country and expect them to value the same things. And unless you change their values, what good will it be to use the military to change their leadership?
It seems short-sided and simplistic, ignoring most of the ill effects of war for the stated ideals to battle evil around the world. But currently, it seems everywhere we are "battling evil" is hardly grateful for the help and just grows more frustrated and upset with America for interfering.
Other than that though, which is really just a few sentences in his book, I thought his advice was good.