Kids will dive deep into God 's word with the CEB Deep Blue Kids Bible. This engaging, interactive Bible offers four-color icons and illustrations throughout with a wealth of notes, devotionals, Bible trivia, and other interactive elements to capture inquisitive young minds. Plus the CEB Deep Blue Kids Bible will encourage a thirst for God 's timeless message as young readers join three life-like kids in discovering the Bible and what it means to their lives. Available in printed ImageFlex, hardcover, imitation leather, and DecoTone bindings. 5 3/8 x 8 3/8 . Ages 8 12. DEEP BLUE KIDS BIBLE CONTENT: Discover It book introductions include things you ll discover, people you ll meet, places you ll go, and word 's a who 's who guide, main theme, key verse, and basic timelines that connect the events they learn in school to the biblical text. Bet You Can! reading challenges denote specific portions to read within suggested timeframes enable kids to experience a rewarding sense of accomplishment while developing a foundation of Bible reading. In-text notes cover four key developmental areas: Sailboat notes highlight positive character traits and emotions; Umbrella notes address challenging character traits and emotions; Lighthouse notes discuss age-appropriate theological concepts; and Life Preserver notes give context to passages that are confusing or hard to understand. God Thoughts / My Thoughts life application feature brings out major Bible themes and encourages age-appropriate response and reflection. Did You Know? callouts focus on fascinating Bible trivia while explaining biblical customs and practices. Navigation Point foundational verses to memorize are highlighted within the Bible text. FEATURES: 5 3/8 x 8 3/8 8 point type 1536 pages 4-color throughout Presentation page In-text subject headings Translation footnotes 8 full-color maps exclusively from National Geographic
Books can be attributed to "Anonymous" for several reasons:
* They are officially published under that name * They are traditional stories not attributed to a specific author * They are religious texts not generally attributed to a specific author
Books whose authorship is merely uncertain should be attributed to Unknown.
Well, to start with, I was expecting the entire bible, but instead I was presented with the book of Mark. That's okay, because Mark was more than enough to explore the features of this study Bible.
After being presented with an introduction, this version started on with the text proper, the verses were presented with other notes and verses that support what is being said. The 2nd verse referred to prophecy and several verses and references were present that support the reference to prophecy. Other versus were presented with clarifying statements taken from the Greek New Testament. The text also points out parallel text from the other Gospels. The version itself is clear and easy to read. I am not a big fan of adding words to make the verse smoother and easier to understand. When Christ feed the crowds, his instruction was to seat people in groups "as if they were having a banquet".
I have other study bibles, and other versions of the Bible. I have copies of them on my Kindle so I am able to go back and forth comparing what is being said and how it is being said between the various versions of the Bible. This could very well become a new tool in my go-to books and I look forward to having it a part of my arsenal.
Pick it up when you have the chance. I think it will make a good first study Bible if not another you can add to your resources.
Okay, it's not that I've actually read the whole thing, I just want to move it of my "currently reading" list so it doesn't stay there forever. I am enamored of the Common English Bible. I love it especially because I admire the way the Psalms are rendered. That's sort of my test case for all translations and paraphrases. Do the Psalms still feel poetic without being obscure? I want to use them in worship and frequently paraphrase them myself because even in the NRSV, the vocabulary is the kind most of us have to stop and ponder to be sure what we're saying. That just doesn't happen in worship, when we read these things quickly in a piece of the liturgy. What I would really like is a paper copy with print I can read. For the Psalms, I'm using the Kindle version, and I have a paperback copy in my office that I'm planning to share in our Bible Study to offer an alternative to the NRSV and the NIV. I got a copy for my daughter as her Confirmation gift (leatherbound, very nice quality). You can read more about the CEB here.
This year, I've become much more strongly convinced of the intrinsic power and value of the Word of God. And the Common English Bible has helped me connect with some of it in a new way.
Disclaimer: I read only the Bible itself, not the study guides.
The overall tone of this Bible translation is fairly easy-going. As far as literal translation goes, it ranks below median; it's more accurate than some contemporary translations (CEV, MSG, NLT), but not as textually reliable as more traditional versions such as NRSV or NIV.
However, I enjoyed reading it. The grammar and syntax used are natural, and much more consistently pleasant than the NIV or CEV. Rarely did I feel that I was being condescended to by the simple language. While I wouldn't give the CEB's Wisdom literature the glowing endorsement another reviewer has, I'm again willing to grant that it's better than other contemporary translations.
Things I didn't like? Some particular translational choices, especially the "Son of Man" idiom rendered "Human One". I didn't like the change of "blessed" to "happy" or "favored" - though it seems justifiable enough in many cases. Did God really ask Job about a hippopotamus and a crocodile? I'd like to single out the epistle to the Hebrews as one book that felt very poorly translated in general.
Having said all that, I feel the CEB is relatively clean, elegant, and doctrinally unbiased. While I'm going back to ESV in the new year, I'd definitely recommend this Bible to anyone looking for a solid contemporary translation.
This translation has been around a few years but was a refreshing read. I still prefer the NRSV in some places but the CEB caused me to pause over the passages I would glance over for familiarity. Loved the change of Son of Man to Human One, and a few others. There are some places it is not as strong, but overall a good translation. I have the Wide Margin version for journaling along with the Study Bible. Read this version from Genesis to Revelation in 2021 via the 5 Day Bible Reading Plan.
Overall, I like the Common English Bible (CEB). I like its tone, which is more conversational than the NRSV and NIV. Occasionally, it uses colloquialisms, which set a different tone than the rest of the CEB. I like the fact that it uses contractions and that the phrase that is usually rendered "Son of Man" now becomes "Human One." I like the "faithfulness of Jesus" where earlier translations have "faith in Jesus," although the translation is not consistent throughout.
I do not like how it renders some of the terms that have been rendered "sodomites," as in the NRSV. 1 Cor 6:9 lists among those who won't inherit the kingdom "both participants in same-sex intercourse"! We really don't know what that term means. Also, I'm not sure about the translation "selfishness" for the Greek term normally translated "flesh."
I commend those who had a hand in bringing this translation into the light. I think that I will stick with my NRSV, but the CEB is an earnest attempt to share the Word in 21st-century words.
Read through the Bible this year, chronologically! Was really great. I don't think I'd do it every year because it's a lot to take in, but I'm so glad I did it.
A study Bible using a paraphrase translation approach
Being the owner of various Study Bibles in different languages (German, English, French) based on different translations (Luther, NLT, NIV, ESV, La Bible du Semeur, Segond 21) and being the owner of the CEB New Testament and CEB Psalms for Kindle, I was interested in the approach that this study Bible uses. The translation which is used for the CEB Study Bible is between a paraphrase (e.g., being used for "The Message") and a thought-for-thought approach (e.g., being used for the "New International Version). The CEB Study Bible is published by Abingdon Press. I was provided with a sample from the publisher through NetGalley that consists of the Introduction to and the Gospel of Mark, as well as excerpts from Exodus (parts of the introduction, chapter 7:13-19 and 26:24-37) and excerpts from Leviticus (Introduction, chapter 6:18-23). The sample provides also a part of the pages that are usual in Bibles such as "unique features" (e.g., the article about "The Authority of Scripture" by Joel B. Green), reliability, relevance, editorial board, contributors, editors, and translators. Very sadly samples of the maps are missing. The text of the study Bible is presented in a simple column with the cross-references in the outside margins (whereas other study Bibles use a two-column approach and place the cross-references in between the columns). Some people consider the single-column approach favorable for a more easy readability, but in my opinion it depends also on personal preferences. The study notes are placed underneath the Bible text in two columns. The "Side-bar Articles", e.g., about God's Kingdom in Mark 3 are placed on a pale blue background between the Bible text and the study notes. I was missing the little maps in the study notes, e.g., about Jesus' ministry that can be found in other study Bibles such as the "New Life Application Study Bible - New Living Translation" or the "La Bible avec notes d'étude Vie Nouvelle - Segond 21". Since I am not a mother-tongue English speaker (that would be German) and since I am neither a Hebrew nor a Greek scholar, I trust the quality of the translation to the over 110 scholars from the 22 faith traditions who have worked on this study Bible. In any case I have discovered that the CEB Study Bible contains far more cross-references than the CEB New Testament - Kindle version. I recommend this Study Bible for those who want to use a study Bible that is easy understandable and has a good readability. For those who prefer a "thought-for-thought" approach a study Bible based on the NIV, NLT, or a similar translations is recommended whereas for those who prefer a "word-for-word" translation, my recommendation would be a study Bible based on the KJV, ESV, or a similar translations.
This book was provided by the publisher through NetGalley free of charge. The reviewer was under no obligation to offer a positive review. #CEBStudyBible #NetGalley
The review copy only contained a few chapters so this review is based on what was available to the writer and not the entire book. A fair proportion of the sample copy contained the introduction and reference material with only a very small proportion of the sample being the actual chapters of the Study Bible.
The CEB Study Bible seemed to contain some nice quality photos and images of locations and items referenced in the text. The Chart of Major Offerings was an interesting summary of the types of tributes mentioned in the book of Leviticus.
Overall it was too hard to write a comprehensive review on the Study Bible due to the limited amount of the actual book given in the sample provided.
I am going to get this out of the way, I Am and Always Will Be A King James Version Gal! But this Bible is awesome. I had my daughter, who is not a King James Version gal, to pick a couple of her favorite verses and read them out of this version. She did and was impressed that she could understand and like the way this one was written. I also spoke to my daughter n law who also likes the King James Version like me, and had her do the same. She was also impressed as to:
I really, really appreciate the sidebars and footnotes that reflect the thoughts, sermons, and teachings of John Wesley. It added value to my reading of Scripture to read it vicariously through the founder of my denomination. My only complaint is some of the translation choices made by the CEB; particularly translating "Son of Man" as "the human one." I've met lots of human beings in my lifetime; none of them look, act, or talk like the "Son of Man" in Daniel or the Gospels. Whatever the original intent of the description, I'm pretty sure it was not to express the human side of Deity.
The Common English Study Bible (CEB) includes introductions to each book with a helpful timeline to key events that occur. It has some pictures of the landscape as well. This version is a very "readable" version with many tools and tips to further improve understanding. There are many cross-references for verses and other complementary verses that support each verse.
The Bible was put together by a number of scholars who assisted in the interpretation as well. This is a great version to get a new perspective on God's Word.
Over all, I really like the way this translation makes sense of certain passages--particularly NT ones. It often put familar verses in a fresh way. There are other translation or editorial calls that found frustrating (son of man=human one, leviathan and behemoth in Job=crocodile and hippopotamus, etc). However, this will be a good translation to consult alongside other translations or read for enjoyment.
I think this is a serviceable translation of scripture. I don't think it is as good as the NRSV and is just as prone to some clunky renderings of the text. However, if someone is looking to read a translation that situates itself outside the King James tradition, then this is an excellent place to start.
I have been following a 365 day reading plan that I began a. few days late, but as it had dates attached to each selection of readings and I had found an accountability buddy following the same plan, I caught up.
Sometimes I bopped into other translations for a few days, but mostly this one. Almost done. I wonder how it ends?? ;)
The Common English Bible is a hybrid common language translation of the Christian Bible. It was first published in 2010 and 2011 by the Common English Bible Committee. This work draws from 117 scholar/translators from 22 denominations/Christian traditions. The Common English Bible website, yes Virginia a Bible with it own web page, lists even more scholar/translators and denominations than the first press pre-releases to other publishers and vendors. CEB itself credits 118 biblical scholars, the website ups the number to 120 translators and 24 denominations.
Maps included are from the National Geographic. They cover Israel in the Late Bronze Age, Exodus, the United Monarchy, Babylonia and Israel, the Roman Empire, Palestine and Jerusalem at the time of Jesus (2 maps), and Paul's Journeys.
The Translation
Two months nearly have passed since I first starting reading through this latest version of the Bible. It is not my 'first dance' with this work so as a disclaimer I'll just say I did not read every word in this version and most certainly did not read it in order. Certain books and chapters that are personal favorites or are generally accepted as critical were my first concern. But I read a lot and will read probably most all of it plus some books and chapters again in the months to come this year.
First, there's no "In the Beginning" in the beginning. Genesis starts off without the familiar and widely known phrase, but God still pronounces light in the familiar English form. The CEB translators and compilers made several decisions about readability and modern vernacular as the basis for their transliteration instead of translation. 'In the beginning' is one of many phrases and formulations that fall by the way in this verbal equivalence and common language Bible.
The Sources and Manuscripts used by the compilers are themselves fairly new or even in progress translations and collections of primary sources at the time of publication of the CEB. A list of Abbreviations and Terms fronts the Preface and includes notes for the reader as to primary/secondary sources used as 'tie breakers' (like all works of this type) to arrive at the final published writing. The recent vintage of this work allows for and makes use of modern and recent scholarship including the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Hybrid/equivalence/transliterations all have tradeoffs as do direct verbatim translation forms of the Bible. In many cases the works we know in English (or another modern current day language) are themselves compiled from numerous sources or alternative versions of the same part of a biblical book. From this the CEB board made several interesting choices about how to present this work. Included are previously unusual items such as the inclusion of contractions mimicking modern speech and communication. Where the bible might use a cubit, a modern measurement has been substituted that for the sake of understandability.
Naming and other conventions of address including familiar forms such as the Son of Man are replaced by a different and according to the CEB Board a more accurate translation. 'Human One' is now the preferred and chosen term.
Even the 'Amens' as some groups call them in prayers are omitted as they don't have any existence in the original texts. The 'Amens' were definitely known (well know additions documented by the scholars at the time of the KJV) to have been included for the purposes of that portion of the bible to also be a prayer book too. After all, in the early centuries after Guttenberg started moving type around, there were still few books available. So compilation was acceptable and 'needed'. CEB is quite consistent in this usage in the portions of the book that I scanned (not skimmed!).
Even the normal formulations of the Lord's Prayer undergoes some minor modification, including the Amens. Strangely, John 3:16 is as unchanged as anything even if it is an archaic formulation. that is easy to understand.
Reviewers Commentary on the Common English Bible
There has been no star valuation placed on this book as it falls outside of my criteria for each rating level. Since I've read many times the Bible in various bits and pieces and numerous commentaries I'll not try to assign it to a range of terrible to life changing. Their are first timers who will find the form of this book may allow them to assign such a rating.
This bible dispenses with many of the grand literary traditions and the poetry that has inspired and influenced other literature to say nothing of peoples traditions for centuries. It is none the less an interesting attempt to again make the Bible readable. Attempts over the years to do similar have in some cases only opened discussions anew in ways that did not always have the effect intended by the latest editors. The rise of the modern Evangelical movement was in no small part driven by among other things the Good News Bible.
The Common English Bible is certainly a work that those who wish to continue to be conversant with Christians and Christianity in 10-20 years will want to familiarize themselves with alongside the versions they have previously read.
My Favorite Bible that I go to first. I love the Wesley and Methodist doctrine, theology and stories in the study part. As well as Charles Wesley's hymns throughout. This is CEB but Leather. Nice colors and good for men or women. However, touch of Pink makes me love it most!
Not really a big fan of these types of study Bibles. I like the whole Bible but with boys of information in the margins or at the bottom of the page. This was like a devotional type book. Maybe that's what the intent was but anyway not for me.
An interesting, new translation, which always helps read things with fresh eyes. But it wasn’t my favorite. I didn’t like how “blessed” was translated to “happy” in the Psalms and Matthew 5, for example. Just some stuff like that. It is very readable, though.
This transition claimed to use more inclusive language for God and God’s people. While it is an improvement over prior translations, I think it could have gone further and still remain true to the original text.
I listened to the audio edition of this Bible. It’s the Common English Bible, and common it is. This makes it listenable and charming in its own way. I thoroughly enjoyed this audio Bible and noticed many things I had missed in reading with my eyes.
One of the best versions of the Bible for easy reading because of the modern English translation. This is the version I keep with me in my purse and goes everywhere with me.
I missed some of the poetry of the NRSV but so appreciate the readability and quirkiness of this translation. Read the whole Bible in 2022 in the 5 Day Reading Plan.
In the last couple years there has been an explosion in new translations of the Bible. The New American Bible, Revised Edition (NAB) is the first new Catholic Bible in 40 years. The New NIV (NIV) is the first major update to the New International Version (NIV84) in nearly 26 years. There have been new versions for the New Living Translation (NLT) and the Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) in the last two years as well. Add to these the not yet fully completed (there are New Testaments, but not yet Old Testaments for these versions,) The Voice and The [Expanded] Bible. If there were too many versions to keep up with previously, then these last few years have not been kind. And now there is another completely new version, the Common English Bible (CEB).
Common English Bible A Fresh Translation to Touch the Heart and Mind 2011
I originally received this new version in November 2011, and was going to review it for Bible Week at the end of November, but when I got it and started reading it I realized this was going to be much harder to do so I took the last several months to really get to know this translation. And after a time I grew to enjoy it!
The CEB is unlike the most recent versions of the Bible, like The [Expanded] Bible, which could be described as a newer, more authentically translated Amplified Bible, and the Voice, which could be described as similar to The Message, although with more emphasis on translation rather than a single interpreter. The CEB is a completely new translation by more than a hundred scholars from 22 denominations and field tested for realistic English common language (something the Message could have used!) The results are passages that are completely different sounding that what I was used to.
Consider the Lord’s Prayer from Matthew 6:9-13:
Our Father who is in heaven, uphold the holiness of your name. Bring in your kingdom so that your will is done on earth as it’s done in heaven. Give us the bread we need for today. Forgive us for the ways we have wronged you, just as we also forgive those who have wronged us. And don’t lead us into temptation, but rescue us from the evil one. Awkward at first I found that I started to get the point of the new translation: accuracy over tradition. Most of us who have been in church for any amount of time have that prayer memorized, but the version we have memorized draws heavily from the King James Version, a Translation that is now over 500 years old. This tradition has been preserved in some of the most well known passages even in so-called current versions like the NIV84, where that first verse reads: “Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name…”
The question is: does anyone know what “hallowed” means? Follow-up question: if we have to translate the translation for it to make sense are we really speaking in a common, normal language?
Much of the New Testament was written in Koine Greek – the street language version of Greek. (As opposed to high Greek, which philosophers used.) Clearly, the writers were focused on making the New Testament accessible to as many readers as possible. And while many translations and interpretations have attempted to do this for modern Christians, the CEB is one of the few that I’ve found to be successful, although not the best.
Take the Message, which I enjoy for what it is – a single person’s attempt to make the Bible accessible – and consider that same passage in Matthew 6, which reads, “Our Father in heaven, Reveal who you are.” While that makes sense and doesn’t need a secondary translation to understand, it isn’t what the original says.
A version that is most similar to the CEB is the NLT, which I also use regularly and believe does a slightly better job of making the Bible accessible, which translates Matthew 6:9 as, “Our Father in heaven, may your name be kept holy.” Comparing the NLT and the CEB I find two things to be true: both are exceptionally clear and both use English in a way that is easy to understand without secondary translation.
But the NLT does a slightly better job of trying not to sound foreign to the reader. It can be quite a shock to read some of the CEB passages when used to the NIV84 or HCSB, as I am. But the NLT doesn’t suffer from such a huge distance between traditional translations and more correct common language interpreting.
That said, the Common English Bible is clearly one of the better new versions around and I applaud the scholarship and cross-denominational support that came together to lead this project. The more excellent translations that there are available the better.
Published at BookGateway.com. This book was provided by the publisher as a review copy.