I follow atheist writer David McAfee on Facebook, although actually I’ve never read any of his books so maybe that’s something I ought to add to the WTRs. Anyway, a few months back he began promoting SHAKEN LOOSE by Ilana DeBare because he had edited it, I believe. The book is about a woman named Annie Maple (if there is any significance to that name I don’t know what it is, and if there is not any significance to the name then it’s a dumb fake name and DeBare could have done better). Annie finds herself in Hell, which in some ways is the traditional Christian idea of Hell as ap lace of endless burning. In other ways, it’s a springboard for a sci-fi story about an alien world and competing factions of monsters. I knew going in that part of the book’s plot involved Annie questioning the morality of Hell, and necessarily of God for creating or permitting it to exist, and that sounded intriguing enough. I had my local library purchase a copy and that’s why I’ve finally gotten the opportunity to read it.
A thing I appreciated about the book is that there’s not a lot of dilly-dallying—Annie finds herself in Hell fairly early on, so it gets pretty quickly to the point. The tortures of Hell are written as burningburningburningburningburningburningburningburning ad infinitum. Then there’s more descriptive wording about it, imagery of flames stripping and charring flesh which continually regenerates; the futile attempt to keep the fire from burning away your face, your tongue, your eyeballs; the most excruciating pain imaginable. Then, just as suddenly as Annie was thrust into the fire, she finds herself spat out of it and in a vast desert, with the “lake” of fire where she had just been visible in the distance, countless human beings inside screaming and begging for release. From here begins a journey across Hell in which she encounters and befriends various additional characters from across the centuries who have also been shaken loose (we have a title!) from the fire, all with the intention of finding an escape so they can each go back to their own time.
The people she encounters include a self-righteous Christian woman named Billie, a Hun nomad named Trua, and Ifechi, an African who says he lives beside the “Great River” in a village called Obodonwa and who believes he is in the “spirit realm” and that he must make a sacrifice to Annie and Billie, who he believes are spirits. Ifechi doesn’t know anything about this so-called “Jesus” and so immediately the question arises of whether his being fated to eternal torture is just. This is of course in addition to the question of whether eternal torture is just for anybody to have to endure. Occasionally the characters pass out and find themselves back in the fire, and the more and more Annie finds herself burningburningburningburningburningburningburningburningburningburningburning, the more she begins to believe this is what she deserves—for being jealous of others, for white lies she’s told, for failing to donate to charity at every opportunity. No doubt these are negative aspects of her character which she is right to examine, but to imagine that they demand blood as recompense is absurd. Annie’s growing rationalization of her situation is akin to somebody experiencing domestic abuse. I’m sure that’s part of the point.
Of course, to the extent this is a critique of a certain type of religious belief, it’s unlikely to make much of an impact. These days, it’s become more fashionable to claim that Hell is not so much literal hellfire as it is the sadness of being apart from God. Nevertheless, it got me thinking that if there were a God, and if that God were truly just, then it would undoubtedly seek restorative justice—there would be no “Hell” except to the extent that accountability involves experiencing grief for the loss of a version of yourself which you believed was acting in good faith at all times. It also got me thinking about one of the typical deflections theists give for the problem of evil: free will. Under this argument, God so badly wants to dispatch evil but this desire conflicts with his desire to respect humans’ free will and, in the final calculation, free will is more important than preventing evil. A couple of points here: if God prioritized free will over preventing evil, it seems counterintuitive to then turn around and punish the end-user for utilizing that free will. It’d be like saying that burning the flag is constitutionally protected free speech, then after the act occurs sentencing the offender to life in prison never-ending torture, forever. Secondly, the idea that God respects our free will too much to prevent evil doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny. Couldn’t it do more to encourage us to adhere to whatever actions it views as virtuous? Wouldn’t an all-powerful God be capable of permitting us to exercise free will while also giving an airtight argument in favor of Christian ethics, or whatever particular belief system it meant to advance? Alternatively, isn’t giving a list of 10 Commandments itself an infringement on our free will, by telling us in what ways to behave in order to receive “moral dessert” (sorry, I’m rewatching ‘The Good Place’ right now). How is the line between respecting our free will and interfering in human affairs drawn?
Anyway, none of this is important because there is no God.
I was worried about Annie being in the desert at the start of the book as it called to mind CITY OF ORANGE by David Yoon, which was slow-moving and uneventful. In fact, though, Annie finds herself in a number of different locales and interacting with demons and, at one point, Satan himself. She finds herself stuck in the middle of a war between different factions of Hell. Satan, speaking in “mellifluous tones” and with “the cadence of a Dr King, the uplift of a Kennedy, the intimate connection of a Bill Clinton”, gives an impassioned speech to the demonic spirits throughout the underworld about how they are still doing the dirty work of God the oppressor and how he would be defanged if they stopped torturing people because then all it could do is beg people to behave differently. When the demons realize Satan is essentially asking them to give up being bad, pandemonium erupts—a war of outrageous proportion while Annie and the other humans can do little more than try to keep out of the way. There’s a cool moment here where Annie worries she’ll get killed in the midst of this fighting. Throughout the book she’d been struggling to recall how it was that she died in the first place and here it reads, “She couldn’t even remember her first goddamn death and now she was going to have a second one.”
That reminds me, earlier in the book Annie spends time thinking about the mechanics of the world she’s found herself in. What if you do die here, what happens? Do you just find yourself back in the fire? How is it that they don’t have to eat or sleep? Is there anything below Hell? Also, the sun never sets and so therefore there is effectively no time that passes here. “She thought of astronauts relying on artificial gravity in space,” DeBare writes. “If the absence of gravity could atrophy your muscles, what would the absence of time do to your mind?” That’s an intriguing thought.
When I start reading any book, I immediately flip to the back to determine how many pages there are so I can keep track of my progress in Goodreads, as often the number of pages in the app does not match the number of pages in my copy (especially when I’m reading an e-book, which I was not in the case). I try to avoid reading any of the words on the last page when I do this, but it was hard not to in this instance. I saw burningburningburningburningburningburningburningburning and a promise that Annie would be returning in a sequel. I was disappointed, as it made me think that nothing ultimately gets resolved in this book and that there would be only a cliffhanger. I’m happy to say that is not the case, not exactly: there is a resolution here after all to the question of whether or not Annie will find the exit from Hell. It is fairly satisfactory.
And I guess that summarizes my feelings about the book overall. I don’t really have anything negative to say about it. I certainly wasn’t over the moon about it, but at the same time I don’t think there’s anything bad to say. There are some effectively creepy moments, as when Annie encounters a marsh filled with dead children, and there is some engaging character work, as Annie and Trua become interested in one another romantically but struggle to act on those feelings because in Hell any attempt at physical contact made with love results in retching and pain. There’s some enjoyable stuff here and ultimately I did like the book. I don’t know that it lived up to what I had been hoping for (not that I have any specific vision of what I had been hoping for), but it was a good read and I didn’t mind spending time with the characters. I’m glad to have gotten to read it, but I don’t know that I would seek out the sequel. It might be safe to call this a 3.5-star rating rounded up.