Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Animal Signals

Rate this book

Why are animal signals reliable? This is the central problem for evolutionary biologists interested in signals. Of course, not all signals are reliable; but most are, otherwise receivers of signals would ignore them. A number of theoretical answers have been proposed and empirical studies made, but there still remains a considerable amount of confusion. The authors, one a theoretician the other a fieldworker, introduce a sense of order to this chaos. A significant cause of confusion has been the tendency for different researchers to use either the same term with different meanings, or different terms with the same meaning. The authors attempt to clarify these differences. A second cause of confusion has arisen because many biologists continue to assume that there is only one correct explanation for signal reliability. The authors argue that the reliability of signals is maintained in several ways, relevant in different circumstances, and that biologists must learn to distinguish between them. In this book they explain the different theories, give examples of signalling systems to which one or another theory applies, and point to the many areas where further work, both theoretical and empirical, is required.

176 pages, Paperback

First published January 8, 2003

3 people are currently reading
111 people want to read

About the author

John Maynard Smith

41 books78 followers
John Maynard Smith FRS was a British theoretical and mathematical evolutionary biologist and geneticist. Originally an aeronautical engineer during the Second World War, he took a second degree in genetics under the well-known biologist J. B. S. Haldane

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
10 (32%)
4 stars
14 (45%)
3 stars
4 (12%)
2 stars
1 (3%)
1 star
2 (6%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Steven.
Author 4 books31 followers
February 21, 2018
exactly what it's supposed to be. it lost a star because there was a bit of "muh flawed mind" in the end which is inexcusable
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.