These essays explore three major philosophical themes from the writings of C. S. Lewis--Truth, Goodness, and Beauty--and provide a comprehensive overview of his philosophical thinking on arguments for Christianity, the character of God, and more.
David Baggett (PhD, Wayne State University) is professor of philosophy in the Rawlings School of Divinity at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia. He is the coauthor of Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality, God and Cosmos: Moral Truth and Human Meaning, and At the Bend of the River Grand. He is the editor of Did the Resurrection Happen? and the coeditor of C.S. Lewis as Philosopher: Truth, Goodness, and Beauty; The Philosophy of Sherlock Holmes; and Harry Potter and Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts.
Here is my previous comment on reading: "I was surprised how good this book was as a whole. It is uneven, the essays running from good to excellent. But even the good ones have critically important theses to defend. It is a read for people with some training in philosophy (or systematic or historical theology)." In my fall 2020 reading, I feel pretty similar. However, I am starting to wonder about some things. I am beginning to think that these singular-topic dives into C.S. Lewis' philosophy is not as helpful to me unless I build a systematic understanding of his thought. I have done that theologically, but haven't got a full sense of every dynamic. The result is that I am often inspired by the essays (original paper talks) in this book, but then wonder if I pressed in on them, whether they are consistent with the whole. There also seems to be an unacknowledged Plato-Aquinas divide here, and I don't have the tools yet to work that through. The way this book should be read is testing each idea, and I haven't done that yet.
Gets four stars for the explicating of several (popular) Lewis themes, theological and philosophical views, and arguments, in a more analytic, rigorous way than Lewis himself did. So, the book is good for those who might want to get a clearer picture on some of Lewis's views.
Here's the breakdown:
I. Truth
1. Lewis's Philosophy of Truth, Goodness and Beauty Peter Kreeft
2. From Atheism to Deism: A Conversation Between Antony Flew and Gary Habermas Gary Habermas and Antony Flew
3. Defending the Dangerous Idea: An Update Victor Reppert
4. Aut Deus Aut Malus Homo: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's "Shocking Alternative" David Horner
5. The Abolition of Man: C. S. Lewis's Prescience Concerning Things to Come Jean Bethke-Elshtain
6. C. S. Lewis and Emotional Doubt: Insights from the Philosophy of Psychology Gary Habermas
II. Goodness
7. Is Divine Iconoclast as Bad as Cosmic Sadist? Lewis Versus Beversluis David Baggett
8. Pursuing Moral Goodness: C. S. Lewis's Understanding of Faith Kevin Kinghorn
9. "Belief" in the Writings of C. S. Lewis David Rozema
10. To Reign in Hell or to Serve in Heaven: C. S. Lewis on the Problem of Hell and Enjoyment of the Good Matthew Lee
11. Lewis and the Necessity of Gratuitous Evil Michael Peterson
III. Beauty
12. Evil and the Cosmic Dance: C. S. Lewis and Beauty's Place in Theodicy Philip Tallon
13. Lewis's Miracles and Mathematical Elegance Russell Howell
14. Beastly Metaphysics: The Beasts of Narnia and Lewis's Reclamation of the Medieval Metaphysics of Participation Michael Muth
15. Lewis and Tolkien on the Power of the Imagination Gregory Bassham
Objectively, the book was pretty bad (with a few exceptions, one being Reppert's essay on the argument from reason), especially when it waxed theological. At some points it got downright heretical (Kinghorn's essay had sanctification coming apart from and prior to justification, and gave "an account of faith that centers on the pursuit of good purposes rather than holding true beliefs"). The essays on goodness (covering the problem of evil and hell, 7, 10, and 11) were the best set of essays, though I staunchly disagreed with almost every point in them. Baggett's essay Is Divine Iconoclast as Bad as Cosmic Sadist had some good things to say, but ultimately settled for rationalism, claiming that there may be evils now that we cannot understand how they are used for good, or are goods, but ultimately we must be able to comprehend the answer (in heaven). Even though this is enough to undermine some contemporary objections to Calvinism (e.g., ones made to me many times by, ironically, one of the essayists, Victor Reppert), I do not agree that finite man must be able to comprehend the details of any God-justifying reason whatever. That just seems like an impossible burden to argue.
So, I wouldn't recommend this book for good theology, or good (not in a technical sense, however) philosophy (with the above caveats), but if you're looking for a more rigorous and analytic presentation (or, interpretation, in some cases) of (some of) C.S. Lewis's more popular themes, then this book will be of interest to you.
Philosophy is the love of wisdom along with an unending desire to find it, understand it, put it into action, and pass it onto others.
Lewis brought a philosophical instinct to everything he did.
There are 3 things that will never die. 1. Truth 2. Goodness 3. Beauty These are the 3 things we all need, and need absolutely.
Our minds want not only some truth and some falsehood, but all truth without limit. Our wills want not only some good and some evil but all good without limit. Our desires, imaginations, feelings or hearts, want not just some beauty and some ugliness, but all beauty without limit. For these are the only 3 things that we never get bored with. And never will for all eternity because they are 3 attributes of God.
All that exist is true. The proper object of of mind. All that exist is goods the proper object of the will. All that exist is beautiful. The proper object of the heart, feelings, imaginations or desires (3rd is harder to define than the first 2)
God has not left Himself without witness in any of the 3 distinctively human, more than animal, powers of the soul- The 3 aspects of the image of God in us: 1. The mind which knows and understands the good. 2. The will which chooses and enforces it. 3. The emotions which love and appreciate it.
The only thing strong enough to overcome an evil passion, is a more powerful good passion.
Lewis often sees pain used as a tool by God for bringing us into right relationship.
“While pleasures can be ignored, pain cannot”
God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks in our conscience, but shouts in our pains. It is His megaphone to rouse a dead world.
There are some very tedious and badly written essays in here by the Steubenville Catholics, who never hesitate to deviate from Lewis. I was about to cast the whole thing off when one such tangent said the The Passion of the Christ was the most beautiful film ever made. I did not come to this to hear opinions but to read about Lewis and Philosophy. Like another reviewer said, you are better off reading Lewis himself and maybe dipping into Tarnas's Passion of the Western Mind to see how Lewis fits or differs in regards to western philosophy.
Somewhat dry and hard to follow, which is ironic given that the book is written on Lewis who is anything but dry. It basically is a collection of articles or papers or certain nuances of Lewis' philosophical thought. I might have to refer back to a written copy of this work again because I recall some parts being interesting.
The intro and first chapter are great. The rest is the tedious slog through secondary and tertiary arguments and literature that is the trademark of modern scholarship. I think you’re better off reading Lewis himself.
An intriguing collection of essays, with a particulary fine contribution from my colleague Michael Muth arguing that Lewis draws on medieval bestiaries in his portrayal of talking animals in the Narnia chronicles and lays the basis for a sacramental metaphysics.
A collection of some of the finest essays that have been written on Lewis’s writings on metaphysics, theodicy, happiness, reason, Joy, and most importantly: truth, goodness, and beauty. The new essays found in the 2nd edition are worth the price of admission.