This is the keynote address delivered by Professor Naquib al-Attas at the “First World Conference on Muslim Education” held in Makkah al-Mukarramah in March 1977.
Buku ini menghuraikan dengan lebih terperinci konsep2 yang terdapat dalam falsafah pendidikan Islam seperti yang dibentangkan oleh Prof. Syed Naquib di Persidangan Pendidikan Islam Dunia kali pertama di Makkah.
Konsep2 ini telah dibentangkan di Persidangan Pendidikan Islam Dunia yang kedua, di Pakistan.
Antara yang menarik adalah perbezaan antara konsep ta'dib dan tarbiyah dan kenapa konsep ta'dib adalah lebih tepat untuk digunakan.
Dalam buku ini juga diterangkan kerangka Universiti Islam yang patut dibina untuk mengambil tempat pendidikan universiti yang dijalankan menurut acuan Barat. Model insan kamil yang ingin dilahirkan melalui universiti Islam, adalah berasaskan manusia contoh yang telah diutuskan Allah kepada kita, iaitu Rasulullah SAW.
Universiti ini perlu menekankan fardu ain sebagai asas dan pengkhususan fardu kifayah yang sudah dijernihkan daripada unsur-unsur asing yang boleh merosakkan perspektif insan tentang agama Islam.
Prof al-Attas menjelaskan dengan teliti dan mendalam akan maksud sebenar pendidikan sebagai ta'dib, bukannya ta'lim (instruction) atau tarbiyah (good breeding). Dengan mengambil makna ini, beliau menyimpulkan bahawa tujuan pendidikan ialah untuk menghasilkan insan yang baik (good man) dan bukannya warganegara yang baik (good citizen). Kebaikan itu bermula dari dalam diri, di mana dengan mengenali diri maka seseorang itu akan berhasil menjadi warganegara yang baik, yang sedar akan hakikat dan tanggungjawabnya di dunia.
Another splendid work by our very own Professor Syed Naquib al-Attas. Short yet dense, this book delivered a powerful and original introduction of education in Islam.
It is important to note that al-Attas insisted of a holistic Islamization in every aspect of life. While every primary schooler is taught that Islam is more than a mere religion, it is din, which meaning implies an organised and civilized living, a metropolitan; a microscosmos in a macrocosmos, none of other modern authorities speak as vocally as al-Attas. This book aimed to introduce an original notion of education from the Islamic point of view, a radical suggestion of an alternative to the incumbent Western secular brand of education. While it would be good to read on his elaboration of the Islamic university rather than a presentation of the "do's and don'ts", he insisted in the introduction that this work is a framework rather than a complete exposition.
Even so, I was thoroughly enjoyed with al-Attas way of slowly developing his discussion. His work possess the rare taste of authority and explanation, rather than blatant polemical way of writing. He started from the very bottom, to the definition of education.
Education, according to al-Attas, is first and foremost a function of knowledge rather than cherishing or mercy, as we would elaborate later. Education consists of both "...recognition and acknowledgement of the proper places of things in the order of creation..." It is important to note that al-Attas insisted that acknowledgement entails concomitant action.
We have already mentioned that education is a function of knowledge rather than cherishing. What holds education together is ta'dib. Ta'dib alone, rather than now-popular word of tarbiyyah that according to al-Attas deserved the pedestal of Islamic education. He insisted that tarbiyyah does not equate to education, nor it is enough to bring proper fruits towards the learner.
He believed that the concept tarbiyyah already showed its fault in the semantic field, as the word cannot be found in any major Arabic lexicons. If there's any, the word only implies a general function of "cherishing, nourishing etc" that can also be applied to cattle-rearing or others as well. Education, as we can see priorly, is a function of recognition and acknowledgement which threads closely to the rational faculties only inherent in man. Secondly, the word implies of a borrowed authority, in the sense of the word rabba which implied the position and power that a parent had over their children, for an example. This borrowed authority does not refer at all to knowledge but rather existential conditions a rabb can bestow upon their vassals. Moreover, the word rabba implies the function of rahmah or mercy rather than 'ilm or knowledge. We have insisted again and again that education implies knowledge rather than nourishing.
It is in this sense that a verse in the Quran where the Pharaoh questioned the prophet Moses, "Did we not cherish (nurabbika) thee as a child among us?" (26:18) No one doubts the inability of the Pharaoh in educating the Prophet, and that is why rather than educate, the Qur'an used the word cherish in describing Pharaoh relation to the Prophet. We have said that tarbiyyah implies a distinct function than knowledge, that is mercy or rahmah. What is meant by mercy in Islamic metaphysics, is the act of bringing towards the degree of completion. As God is the All-Merciful, than it suited to him that his act of rahmah is of the greatest feat, that is bestowing of existence to everything that exists. A murabbi, possessing far more limited power of rahmah than the All-Merciful could only bring towards the degrees of completion of physical and intellectual field of his learners. And this, is far less than satisfactory demanded by education.
The critique against the concept of tarbiyyah came as a shock to me as I have always assumed that the neo-Islamization movement in Malaysia came directly from the students of al-Attas. But recent meetings with a handful of youths that assumed the name of murabbis proved that the name of al-Attas seemed destitute from their mind. Then, from where these murabbis acquired their path of education? I must refrain from providing any comments regarding the activities of those circles of murabbis and their acolytes, but I can attest that their brand of education at first gland thread more closely to the function of cherishing rather than knowledge. Heck, even some of the people are calling their brand of education as "Islam geli-geli" (Islam viewed from the rose-glossed glass panel), and in dark corner somewhere people are saying that those circles are no more than a matchmaking activity. Who knows? But if indeed the matchmaking activity is true, then it accomplished the meaning implied by the word tarbiyyah (nourishing, cherishing), is it not? ;)
Enlightenment! It helps me to understand how important adab is and how it links towards the concept of education in Islam. Something that i had not understand before.
A penetrating and (in my view) correct diagnosis of the root of the contemporary problems facing the Muslim Ummah, followed by an original exposition of the Islamization of contemporary knowledge by one of the most prominent Muslim thinker/scholar of our age. Erudite, confident and exquisitely written.
Alhamdulillah, feeling grateful to have had an opportunity to prepare for “Seminar Pembangunan Intelektual, PMMM” by reading this book.
Few points from the book; The Concept of Education in Islam.
• Reframing the educational concept of the Muslim intellectual tradition. (Like bringing al-Ghazali’s ideas— al-Ihya’)
1) The scientific nature of the Arabic language • Begins by defining the terms. The effect of terms and language on one’s worldview.
2) Islamisation of language
3) Today’s General dilemma is caused by lack of “Adab”. • Definition of “adab” • How “adab” is lost in the community: Confusion and error in knowledge. • Loss of adab in community gives rise to unqualified leaders.
4) Concept of Education in Islam: • Ta’dib rather than Tarbiyah.
5) The form of Education in Islam: • The purpose: to produce a good man rather than a good citizen • All men should learn فرض عين • Redefining the فرض عين (not just things that are taught in the childhood stage)
6) Concept of Islamic University • Supports the purpose of the education “to produce a good man”: University must be a reflection of the perfect man. • Subjects that should be taught in the Islamic University.
——
That’s just my brief review, conclusion on this book. Definitely need to read it again and again…
For those study in the Islamic studies field, books by the Royal Professor Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas should be read, his works bridge the gap between the islamic intellectual theories and the reality of this age. Of course 5/5 to the masterpiece.
As the author states at the start, this is a "book of definitions relating to the essential.elements in the concept of education and educational process as envisaged in Islam".
The main ideas of this book highlight that Prof emphasizes the concept of education in Islam as being more about ta'dib rather than tarbiyah.
Prof explains from the beginning what the true meaning of education is, as well as the meaning of tarbiyah and ta'dib and the differences between them.
Tarbiyah mainly refers to nurturing and focuses on physical and mental growth, whereas ta'dib is about instilling proper adab (right action), with greater emphasis on the intellectual and spiritual dimensions. All of this is presented with arguments supporting Prof's idea.
Another interesting idea is that Prof stresses that the main purpose of Islamic education is to form a good man, not merely a good society or citizen as in the secular framework.
The ultimate goal is to attain sa'adah (true happiness) through knowing God. A community made up of good men will eventually form a great ummah.
No need new policies no need new ijtihad prof al attas already elaborate succintly clear about how education should be instilled in human being as rational animal.
Bagus: menelaah konsep pendidikan Islam dengan bertolak dari konsep-konsep kunci dan melacaknya dari sudut bahasa. Saya membaca buku ini dalam versi terjemahan bahasa Indonesia. Terbitan Mizan, diterjemahkan oleh Haidar Bagir, diedit oleh Jalaluddin Rakhmat.
All is all a short but good read; Prof. Naquib al-Attas takes a lexicographical approach in restoring meanings to key terms and concepts in order to clarify the concept of Education in Islam.