The pictures are outstanding. How could they not be? They capture the near infinite reach of space and time, prompting thoughts about the origin of it all, including whether there is an origin at all. Unfortunately, the text accompanying the pictures was poor in multiple respects. A good bit led with something along the lines of a picture looking “like a hoard of gems fit for an emperor’s collection” or “like a cosmic weapon run amok” - or about gas and dust of various colors in this or that formation. That sort of thing. Or, the text gets technical real fast, including the Hubble cameras, and goes way behind the "pretty picture" language that is used. In other words, there is a sweet spot between fluff and technical that is missed in the text.
There’s no theory in this book that places these photos in context to explain what it is that we are seeing. For example, galaxies are dominant in this picture book, but why are they round, or off-round? Why do they rotate in one direction and not another? What is it about the spiral arms - are they flowing into the galactic center (and illustrate Einstein’s theory of general relativity - the flowing inward to a gravitational center) or are they flowing outward, spitting matter and energy outward via angular momentum? Why do galaxies flatten like a “pancake disk” with a bulge in the center? Is there a connection in galaxy formation between a relatively unconsolidated gas and dust, a barred galaxy, and consolidating spiral galaxies - with the latter being a further pulling inward of the former? In other words, are we seeing in these photos a “natural” galactic sequence? And is the end result of such inward motion a black hole and, if so, why do they not, as a big bang scenario might do, explode from the instabilities that come with singularities? The writer says that a super massive black hole “ejects jets at high speed gas into space,” but doesn't explain why this is so, or how “ejection” works when black holes retain everything, even light.
Where definitive explanations are not possible (likely, mostly), at least then some speculative questions that these photos prompt would have been more valuable to the reader than characterizing what is being shown as pretty pictures that look like something, or the lapsing into technical language that was impossible to follow.