There were satisfying aspects of this book but also extremely disappointing aspects which just barely balanced each other out. The biggest disappointment would be the fact that Ahhotep did NOT have a face off with Apophis. In fact, Apophis kinda died like a chump before the big clash between two leaders/magicians could come to a head. It made me feel as if the buildup in the three books was just filler! The chase for Khamundi also led to nothing. They chased him only to find a corpse at the end of it. It seemed like there was years of conflict, then a quick clean up at the end. Is it that Jacq likes to write about sieges but avoids 1:1 battles?
There was some more emotional pull in the book. While it is still pretty shallow waters, I felt more from Ahhotep. She wasn’t completely focused on the war. Throughout the series, the character I’ve felt the most growth in has been Moustache. He was a very down & out, easily depressed rebel without direction in the first book to a confident, never doubting his cause as well as willing to die for it leader of an army regimen in the last book. I think this character was the most interesting to follow. You saw another side of the rebellion which was more dynamic and emotional than Ahhotep’s view of things.
I also really enjoyed how the realms of magic and reality seemed to blur. Things were very clear cut in the first book, and it was mostly deus ex machina resolving problems. In this book, things could have been seen either way. Was it the god who made the volcano to erupt which lead to their conquering of Avaris or was it just a natural phenomenon? There were hints here and there that an eruption was coming. I think this added a lot of intrigue to the storyline along with mysticism to the ancient world which was so rooted in its religion.
I could not guess “the spy.” Jacq cleverly put in twists here and there that would put different characters under suspicion. I knew I’d be saddened by the discovery too! Unfortunately, the final confrontation of this person needed so much more depth to it than was written. The spy spared a life as he died, but you never really saw the person’s emotion in it. Jacq just kind of mentions, “he could have slit his throat, but didn’t.” I think it was too quick and did the character a disservice.
I found it interesting that while Jacq took liberties with Ahhotep’s life, her son Ahmose’s storyline was mostly on the mark with the historical evidence left to us. His father and brother died at the right age in Ahmose’s life in the book, Ahmose founded the 18th Dynasty, his first son was Amenhotep, he overtook large building projects, etc. Only the origin of his wife was changed from being his sister to a commoner he met randomly. I’m sure Jacq avoided this with both Ahhotep & Ahmose because of the issue of incest, but it was a part of the royal lifestyle back then and is something that can be explained to the reader to ease the thought of it in the plot. There are ways to get around it, but Jacq decided to void the issue altogether which does take you out of the story if you know the history of these actual historical figures. Historical figures should be handled with great care and kept in line with what history tells us about them. I appreciate the personalities he gave them, but the storyline veered a bit off.
Conflict wise, this was the most disappointing of the three books. But the landscape and people gave the reader satisfaction in their growth and beliefs. So while still an enjoyable read, Jacq could have given us at least one head to head with Ahhotep and the emperor of the Hyksos. It seemed like the battles he narrated ended rather easily either by act of god or a give up by a character. I will read more from this author, but I do hope he gives more characterization as well as depth in conflict resolutions.