'Rethinking Global Sisterhood: Western Feminism and Iran' by Nima Naghibi is a rather short scholarly work on the history of feminism in Iran, especially seen in relation to Western feminism.
The book is divided into four main parts, visualized in the book as individual chapters. These parts are preceded by the Preface and Introduction and proceeded by the Conclusion. The four main parts/chapters are as follows:
1. Enlightening the Other: Christian Sisters and Intrepid Adventuresses
Deals with the colonialist view of the Eastern 'Other'. How Western feminist position themselves as more enlightened in comparison to the female 'other' in Persia.
2. Scopophilic Desires: Unveiling Iranian Women
The desire of the West to unveil Iranian women, and in doing so supporting the Shah when he bans women from veiling in public (this ban is later removed, but women who veil are unable to work in public positions). Feminism and unveiling becomes equal to the Western (American) influence. Iranian feminism is handled by royalty/upper class women, who do not take the needs of the working class women into consideration.
3. Global Sisters in Revolutionary Iran
How Western feminists made things harder for the Iranian feminists post the 1979-revolution.
4. Female Homosocial Communities in Iranian Feminist Film
The use of film (both feature and documentary) to highlight women's issues and give women a voice - even if this voice is often censored or not shown widely in Iran.
All-over I thought it was a really interesting book. Nima Naghibi taught me a lot about the history of feminism in Iran. I agree with her that Western feminists have/have had a tendency to speak for all the women in the world - when in reality they have no idea what women across the globe really need. Whether women veil or not, is that really the biggest issue? Is everything going to be solved by removing the veil? Personally I don't think so, I think education and enforcement of human rights and a change of laws and the status quo is much much more important.