I've been waiting for a Penelopiad for very long now, dissatisfied as I've been by other books purporting to tell "The Odyssey" from the side of the hero's wife, so I picked this book up with much hope and excitement. And it was surprising from the start, namely for the choice of the goddess Hera as the POV to narrate the story of Penelope as she waits for the return of Odysseus from Troy, an original decision I've never seen before and that, although it would've been my personal preference to have it from the POV of Penelope herself, makes for a few interesting twists.
Having the goddess narrating it all has advantages, like a bird's eye view of the entirety of Ithaca and beyond, and that she can tell the inner doings as well as the behaviour of everyone on the island, noble and slave, which wouldn't be possible with a sole, human POV. Hera sees everything and everyone, Hera knows everything and describes everyone, it's an all-seeing eye that plunges you into the story from an advantageous position of observer that won't miss anything. But, this very style of POV has the disadvantage that for its very nature keeps you at arm's length and detached from the characters.
You don't connect with the characters, there are too many of them that have their time in the sun for one second, some appearing just in a line, a couple of dialogue exchanges, a fleeting run by the place. There are main characters too, of course, who do have more onpage time, but Hera is fickle and arbitrarily decides who gets her attention best, favouring a character that's not Penelope. Really, what does Clytemnestra have that Penelope doesn't? And why does the goddess of women and family favour these women who aren't exactly models of virtue and good behaviour over the woman who is definitely synonymous with loyalty, family, and motherhood? Sometimes, I wonder if the author is biased towards Clytemnestra and Helen for subversion of narratives, to go counter to the usual portrayals of these two, than in doing Penelope justice. By all accounts, she should be Hera's favourite if you kept faithful to the Greek legends.
Besides the above, I think my biggest trouble with this book was the writing. Because of the POV style, not because of the prose; the prose is fine, North has some beautifully crafted passages. But the point of view used to narrate the story is all over the place: it opens in third person universal POV, and it doesn't stay but changes all the time, so one time it becomes first person, then second person tense, then third person limited, then... Always changing. One line you have Hera telling you about someone, and right there appear a slave, a secondary character. These changes of perspective and setting happen abruptly, in a matter of one paragraph to the next. Hera obsessively crams in everything and everyone, even going back and forth in time. It's awfully confusing, not to me personally because I know the Ithacan setting of the Odyssey very well so I know what is going on, but not every reader will, so this writing is likely to be discouraging. If the writing ever killed a story, this came close, and it makes me sad because I really like Penelope and this interpretation of her story didn't work for me solely because of the writing and POV style.
Thank you to Redhook Books for the ARC in exchange for an honest review.