Erik H. Erikson is recognized as one of the world's leading figures in the field of psychoanalysis and human development. His ideas about the stages of development, the sources of identity, and the interdependence of individual growth and historical change revolutionized our understanding of the nature and course of psychological growth. Erikson, whose work first described the now familiar concepts of "identity crisis" and "life cycle," provided an unprecedented framework for considering the individual psyche within society and culture. Unveiling a dynamic process of psychological development, he emphasized the tendency toward growth and the integration of multiple influences--the biological, social, psychological, cultural, and historical. With writings from Erikson's entire career, including major work from Childhood and Society, Insight and Responsibility, Young Man Luther , and Gandhi's Truth , this invaluable reader charts the influence of Erikson's thinking in the areas of child psychology, development through the lifespan, leadership, and moral growth.
Erik Erikson was a German-born American developmental psychologist and psychoanalyst known for his theory on psychosocial development of human beings. He may be most famous for coining the phrase identity crisis. His son, Kai T. Erikson, is a noted American sociologist.
Although Erikson lacked even a bachelor's degree, he served as a professor at prominent institutions such as Harvard and Yale.
This was an excellent introduction to Erikson's work. He is a very thought provoking writer. His work goes beyond psychology into philosophy, anthropology/sociology, and history. His thorough attempt to understand and comment on the minds of Martin Luther, Thomas Jefferson and Gandhi was fascinating. I learned a great deal and feel there is much more I can learn from this man.
Erikson's stages of psychosocial development are so important and interesting. He expands on Freud's stages and extends them well into adolescence and adulthood. I wish I had been exposed to them, especially the final stage, earlier on because it's particularly valuable regarding end-of-life care.
Ok I didn’t read the chapters “on leaders” because boring, but I’m still counting this as read because I got to page 225.
Idk wtf was up with the editor of this collection but I hated his writing style - his run on sentences killed me, and I was sad to not connect with his sense of Erickson.
However, the chapters I read were a great introduction to Erickson. I would like to read more of his work, especially from Childhood and Society.
Overall, wouldn’t recommend this as an intro to Erickson.