Defending a Higher Law: Why We Must Resist Same-Sex "Marriage" and the Homosexual Movement

by TFP Committee of American Issues

With the same-sex "marriage" debate heating up all across the country, the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property (TFP) is entering into the cultural fray with a compelling new book which clearly spells out why pro-famly America must react. The new TFP work is titled Defending a Higher Why We Must Resist Same-Sex "Marriage" and the Homosexual Movement. Written by TFP's Committee on American Issues, the 212-page book is a much needed defense of traditional marriage based on Catholic tradition and natural law. It is a powerful and incisive attack on the myths buttressing homosexual agenda.

Genres: Philosophy, Religion

212 pages, Paperback

First published February 17, 2004

Reviews

[Ryan · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is a clear and articulate case against the legalization of same-sex marriage. Although this is a Catholic publication, their core arguments are primarily based on natural law.

I was unaware of the history of the homosexual movement, which has its roots in the 1930s and 1940s. I was also unaware of the organized propaganda tactics employed to get the public to accept and eventually endorse homosexual marriage. These topics are covered thoroughly.

This book analyzes and dismantles the sophistry that seems to dominate public debate of this topic. It also provides a brief history of what the church fathers believed and wrote as well as Catholic publications that address homosexuality.

Overall, this is a very well-written and persuasive book. The only parts I felt were less relevant to me were the parts about Catholic ecclesiastical discipline and the occasional appeal to the "Blessed Virgin Mary."

[Scott · Rating 4 out of 5]

Less a book than a robust pamphlet, Defending a Higher Law is nonetheless an interesting read when it comes to this key issue in the culture wars. I liked it for two reasons:

First, it provides a thoroughly researched explanation of why homosexual marriage must be opposed. Unlike many television "discussions" I have seen that often boil down to little more than bumper sticker sloganeering, Defending a Higher Law actually delves into the biblical, theological, historical, pathological and psychological issues that surround homosexuality and the "gay" culture. While ALWAYS being careful to point out that homosexuals deserve the respect and care due any other human being, it nevertheless systematically refutes the oft-heard arguments for legitimizing "same sex marriages," particularly those that are often based on false notions of "equality" and compassion."

Speaking of "compassion," this was the second reason why I found the book particularly interesting. Defending Higher Law details the carefully orchestrated public relations campaign put together by gay activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen. It is fascinating to read, not just because of how this campaign was used to promote the idea of same sex marriage, but also because of how I am now seeing these SAME TACTICS used to promote other issues sacrosanct to the Left that are opposed by mainstream America. The tactics include:

1) "isolate and silence" those you can't convince to come to your side
2) "desensitize, jam, and convert" those you can
3) "mobilize" those who already agree with you

Defending a Higher Law details what each of these points means in actual practice, and demonstrated how they were successfully used to push "same sex marriage."

Again, Defending a Higher Law is less a book than a manifesto, but its breezy 200 pages made for swift and interesting reading, especially in light of the fact that this title was published around 2003, long before the cultural mess we now truly find ourselves in. In short: this book predicted exactly where we are today, a culture no longer rooted in right reason but one that has since moved from "same sex marriages" to fluid concepts of gender (promoted using the same three action points listed above).

[booklady · Rating 5 out of 5]

An excellent defense of the truth about marriage, why it is sacred and so essential to defend it. Sts. Thomas More and John Fisher died to preserve the sanctity of marriage and now it is being tested as never before. Traditional marriage is the bedrock of the family which is the core of our society. As it goes, so goes our entire moral order. Yes, it matters very much.

Organized in 3 parts: 1) the Revolution; 2) Answering arguments; and 3) Natural Law and Church Teaching.

Is available to download for free here.

[Jazz Perreira]

Mind opening!

[Gregory · Rating 5 out of 5]

Excellent 200 page book giving all the religious, philosophical, rational, natural, and logical arguments why the same-sex "marriage" movement should be opposed.

Defending a Higher Law also shows the processive side to the whole movement and how it is a pagan operation intent on destroying the family and hence civilisation. Not only is it processive, but it also total and dominante.

Especially in these days, everyone should have a copy of this book.

[James · Rating 5 out of 5]

The recent victories of the homosexual movement in America was a real wakeup call for me. In looking for good argumentation against same-sex "marriage", I came across this book, "Defending a Higher Law." Thoroughly researched and from a Catholic perspective, it is by far the most complete analysis of the current crisis afflicting America, approaching the homosexual revolution from a moral, scientific, and historical angle. A must read for anyone interested in fighting the homosexual revolution and preserving the family and the sanctity of marriage -- very worth while.

[Jose · Rating 5 out of 5]

We must resist indeed,the book offers a Compact yet very concise and informative approach as well as talking points and replies to those who stubbornly refuse Not just Morality but Natural Law.Not only should TheoCon(TheoConservative such as myself/Morally Conservative) but Civil Libertarians and FiscalOnlyStyle Conservatives and even those who will disagree with the book,Some will accuse and throw the usual ad verbatim,Mongering,Fear,and the ugly word itself:bigotry which is all utter nonsense.It is a Sin,always has been not matter what a reformist sect might say,There are some disturbing things in here such as Mr.Hay who basically started it all in some respects with NeoPagan and Occultist ties not to mention marxistovertones..despite being born and raised a catholic,he had his first "experience" at 14 with a man twice his age(which would explain his endorsement of Nambla in the 80s),founder of the mattine society which had ties to the CPUSA and hollywood radicals and liberals,there is denying the influence on the movement as a whole.You will also learn some of the new yet ever-changing tactics of trying to win over not just the public's heart but infusing into mass media "the message".Myself Personally I echo the same as the book in the very beginning points out, I vehemently oppose it in a peaceful civil and legal manner and from a Moral standpoint and If I was a Darwinist or other I would oppose it from a Point of violating Natural Law.Please read the book before you "Bash" it.