A collection of essays explores the richness and variety of the English language and some unusual words and examines the two opposing schools of modern literary criticism, the "Graphireader" and "Epireader"
Over thirty years old, and still pretty much unsurpassed in its insights. Don't be fooled by the book's appearance--i.e., as a medley of belletristic essays. If you're truly tuned in to what Donoghue is saying here, it'll alter the way you think about style in literary criticism, and indeed in literature. Skip the first two chapters, but read the rest. Highlights include Donoghue's take on Blackmur, and the "graphireading" section toward the end.
A witty, generous, illuminating guide through twentieth-century literary theory and criticism (even if, as seems to be the case with a lot of very good lit-crit books, the parts are probably greater than the whole) and a fine, fine collection of open-minded but old-school humanistic criticism in its own right.
A snazzy and concise overview of some of the major hitters of 20th century literary criticism. Donoghue sketches a rough divide between practitioners of "epireading" and "graphireading"--respectively--allowing the strenghts and weaknesses of both modes to come through.
The sections on Bloom, Derrida, Blackmur, Burke and Kenner were particularly thorough and illuminating.