What do you think?
Rate this book
The University Socialist Club and the Contest for Malaya: Tangled Strands of Modernity
The book, using a small group of left-wing student activists as a prism, explores the complex politics that underpinned the making of nation-states in Singapore and Malaysia after World War Two. While most works have viewed the period in terms of political contestation groups, the book demonstrates how it is better understood as involving a shared modernist project framed by British-planned decolonization. This pursuit of nationalist modernity was characterized by an optimism to replace the colonial system with a new state and mobilize the people into a new relationship with the state, according them new responsibilities as well as new rights.
This book, based on student writings, official documents and oral history interviews, brings to life various modernist strands – liberal-democratic, ethnic-communal, and Fabian and Marxist socialist – seeking to determine the form of postcolonial Malaya. It uncovers a hitherto little-seen world where the meanings of loud slogans were fluid, vague and deeply contested. This world also comprised as much convergence between the groups as conflict, including collaboration between the Socialist Club and other political and student groups which were once its rivals, while its main ally eventually became its nemesis.
This book, based on student writings, official documents and oral history interviews, brings to life various modernist strands – liberal-democratic, ethnic-communal, and Fabian and Marxist socialist – seeking to determine the form of postcolonial Malaya. It uncovers a hitherto little-seen world where the meanings of loud slogans were fluid, vague and deeply contested. This world also comprised as much convergence between the groups as conflict, including collaboration between the Socialist Club and other political and student groups which were once its rivals, while its main ally eventually became its nemesis.
- GenresHistory
350 pages, Paperback
First published May 10, 2012
3 people are currently reading
29 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
February 13, 2017
This work represents an important contribution, more generally to the historiography of Singapore, and in particular to the topic of post-WWII student and political activism. Marshalling material from oral histories to colonial archives and secondary literature, the authors weave a compelling and convincing narrative of the activities undertaken by the University of Malaya (and later Singapore) Socialist Club. The book demonstrates that student activism in postwar Singapore was fraught with much tension, as debates surrounding the boundaries of political discourse were caught up in - or indeed contributed to - decolonisation and the overarching Cold War conflict.
Rather than echoing the familiar narrative of schism between the People's Action Party and its political opponents, the book casts a critical eye on essentialist accounts of history, emphasising instead the many convergences between the multiple political actors of the time. Indeed, the authors go one step further by discussing the role that history (as in the past) and History (as in the scholarly discipline) play in shaping the ways historical figures remember and (re)construct the past for consumption.
Though the narrative can be choppy at times, and even as the academic jargon employed might be difficult for general readers, the book represents an example of how history can be, and is indeed always, alive (even for tiny Singapore), for reinterpretations of the past can always proffer fresh insights as they highlight new problems. This is a story that will make readers feel for its characters and for the paths explored and fought for, but ultimately not taken.
Rather than echoing the familiar narrative of schism between the People's Action Party and its political opponents, the book casts a critical eye on essentialist accounts of history, emphasising instead the many convergences between the multiple political actors of the time. Indeed, the authors go one step further by discussing the role that history (as in the past) and History (as in the scholarly discipline) play in shaping the ways historical figures remember and (re)construct the past for consumption.
Though the narrative can be choppy at times, and even as the academic jargon employed might be difficult for general readers, the book represents an example of how history can be, and is indeed always, alive (even for tiny Singapore), for reinterpretations of the past can always proffer fresh insights as they highlight new problems. This is a story that will make readers feel for its characters and for the paths explored and fought for, but ultimately not taken.
April 9, 2022
A detailed and well-researched account of a part of history that is missing from National Education textbooks. The authors show how many of the accusations against the members of the Club were unfounded, but also question the efficacy of its methods in achieving its goal of a more fair and free nation. The aftermath of the many state attempts to silence and restrict those associated with the Club is still felt today, and it is hard to imagine any local student organisation today being as outspoken and active as the Club was in its heyday.
July 26, 2020
Some chapters were rather dry and took me awhile to get through but overall, I found the book to be interesting and eye opening. It's offers in-depth information that wasn't made available to me when I was a student and allowed me to understand the left's contributions to Singapore, instead of just viewing them in a negative light or as Communist sympathisers.
April 13, 2014
The kind of history I wish was taught and discussed in school.
February 19, 2016
Pioneering, important, well-written and -researched book.
May 2, 2017
This read like a collection of repetitive sources masquerading as an academic narrative.
While the authors rightly discuss the many contesting and converging strands of socialism and 'modern rationalism' held by the multitude of political actors in the 50s and 60s, I get the feel that the narrative would have read a lot better as an unashamedly high political/abstract ideological discussion, rather than a pseudo-history trapped within the half-baked contextualisation of the University Socialist Club's activities. Given the repeated emphasis on the USC's peripheral role in shaping events (somewhat compensated by their ability to shape terms of debate), it is perplexing as to why the authors chose the USC as the premise for an otherwise illuminating discussion about modernity, socialism, politics, and activism.
While the authors rightly discuss the many contesting and converging strands of socialism and 'modern rationalism' held by the multitude of political actors in the 50s and 60s, I get the feel that the narrative would have read a lot better as an unashamedly high political/abstract ideological discussion, rather than a pseudo-history trapped within the half-baked contextualisation of the University Socialist Club's activities. Given the repeated emphasis on the USC's peripheral role in shaping events (somewhat compensated by their ability to shape terms of debate), it is perplexing as to why the authors chose the USC as the premise for an otherwise illuminating discussion about modernity, socialism, politics, and activism.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews