It took me some time to figure out how to rate this one. Two stars, or three? I finally settled for 2.5, rounded up.
After the wonderful ride that was Forbidden, I was really looking forward to Mortal. And for the first few chapters, it did not disappoint. However, it wasn't long before the book and I ran into some disagreements. I shall express them in dialogue form.
BOOK: When we last left our heroes, they had discovered the One, the boy to bring the world back to life. Now, nine years have passed. The boy's blood has awakened about twelve hundred Nomads and city folk who now call themselves Mortals. These Mortals live a wild life, full of emotion and all the joy and pain that comes with it.
ME: Awesome! Can I get some more of Triphon? I loved him in the first book.
BOOK: Well—no. Actually, he'll have one scene with Rom before he dies. But here's Roland. He's a tough and jingoistic Nomad prince who doesn't give a flip what anyone thinks of him. He just goes on being awesome with the superpowers Jonathan's blood gave him.
ME: Ooh, me likey! Wait—superpowers? I thought blood returned human emotion.
BOOK: It does that too, but it also gives Mortals superpowers. Superior perception, reflexes, longer life span, that sort of thing.
ME: Um, I don't think that makes any sense, but it's so awesome I don't really care.
BOOK: I've also got Dark Bloods. They're what Saric made once he came out of stasis, killed Pravus, and used some sort of secret thing to give himself true emotion and super strength. But all of his emotions are skewed in a negative direction. He's used his blood to give others the same life he has, stripping them of their free will in the process.
ME: Sounds like Saric. Man, I hate that guy.
BOOK: Feyn becomes a Dark Blood.
ME: WHAT? NOOOOOOOOO
BOOK: Yeah, Saric wakes her from stasis and turns her into a Dark Blood against her will. But that doesn't really matter since he strips her of her own and proceeds to act like the most abusive boyfriend you will ever meet.
ME: So he essentially mind-rapes her into loving him? That's really creepy.
BOOK: Glad you think that. It's supposed to be creepy.
ME: Does Feyn find a way to overcome that? I loved her in the first book, and I want to cry when I think about what Saric has done to her.
BOOK: Well, there's one point where it looks like she's come around….
ME: Yay!
BOOK: …but it turns out to be a sham.
ME: No.
BOOK: Yeah. Turns out Jonathan wasn't trying to turn her back onto the right path at all. He was just showing her what her future would hold. He actually wanted her to turn Judas Iscariot on him. Everything she did that made it seem like she was coming around? That was actually supposed to be bad.
ME: But you said Jonathan told her to do all those things.
BOOK: Looks that way.
ME: Wait—why would the Christ figure TELL Feyn to betray him?
BOOK: Because that's what Jesus did with Judas.
ME: ...
BOOK: Don't you remember? Jesus looked Judas in the eye and said "Do it quickly." That meant Jesus WANTED Judas to betray him, since He knew it would further his plan.
ME: Um, book?
BOOK: See, Jesus' purpose was to die. That was the plan all along. And Judas fulfilled that plan by betraying Jesus, just like Feyn fulfilled Jonathan's plan by handing him over to Saric.
ME: Book?
BOOK: And then Saric kills Jonathan because Jonathan asks him to. And by submitting to Jonathan's will, Saric's entire outlook on life is rewritten!
ME: So…by submitting to Jonathan's will in betraying him, Feyn breaks free of Saric's mind control?
BOOK: Sort of. She becomes the new Saric.
ME: wut
BOOK: Yeah! Feyn becomes the new Saric and Saric becomes the new Feyn! It's poetic.
ME: Okay. So let me get this allegory straight. Feyn is Judas and Saric is Satan. Both submit to Jonathan's will in handing him over to be killed and in killing him. But since Jonathan showed Feyn the truth BEFORE she handed him over, the act of handing him over makes her more evil. Never mind that Saric stripped Feyn of her free will. Whereas Saric's act of submission makes him better, because he didn't know the truth before he killed Jonathan. So Satan is freed from his self-made prison by killing Jesus, but Judas goes further into it by handing Jesus over to be killed.
BOOK: Exactly!
ME: Book, I don't know WHAT Bible translation you're using, but I think it's the wrong one. I've read the crucifixion story in everything from King James to the Message, and I NEVER got that interpretation.
BOOK: But it makes sense, doesn't it?
ME: Not so much. All it makes is bad theology.
BOOK: What do you mean? My theology is fantastic!
ME: No, it's not. See, according to you, it's okay to literally kill Jesus, so long as you haven't seen the truth up to that point. But if you've seen the truth and Jesus ASKS you to sin—never mind that God doesn't tempt people to sin and Jesus is God—He'll still punish you for it. It doesn't matter if Satan strips you of your free will first. You did the wrong thing and you deserve to be punished.
BOOK: Well, you have to admit my comparison between Sovereigns and Christians and Mortals and Jews is good theology.
ME: The only thing I'll admit is that it's a crappy deal.
BOOK: No, it's a GREAT deal! Jonathan lives in the Sovereigns and the Sovereigns are more in tune with each other and the world!
ME: They lose all their Mortal powers and they die young. That SUCKS.
BOOK: But—but—the theology!
ME: Sucks. Your theology sucks. The entire book of Hebrews is about how Christianity is better than Judaism, but according to you, Judaism is a million times cooler, but we still need to embrace Christianity because it's right. That is terrible theology.
BOOK: I—well—you just don't appreciate me for who I am!
ME: I wanted to appreciate you, but then you got all weird on me.
BOOK: C'mon, at least read my sequel!
ME: I don't know….
BOOK: The theology might be better!
ME: *sigh* Oh, very well. But your sequel had better not disappoint.
BOOK: No promises.